Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

Gentlemen,I know you will find this very interesting and disturbing. I don't think this has been posted yet, but it's important because it's very strong evidence of media PARTICIPATION (not just complicity) in the 9/11 event that put the U.S. into military conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is something that has been puzzling me for a while. The video clip below shows various news clips of the supposed second plane that hit the south tower of the World Trade Center, which was was the second tower to be hit. It appears that some video faking is going on. For example, the smoke coming from the first tower to be hit..., the north tower, was basically traveling over the south tower. It seems that different TV news channels showed the same plane hitting the same tower from different directions. I'm very serious here. I'll put the link below and tell you what to look for.The smoke from the North Tower, that had already been hit, is your point of reference. It is always traveling or flowing in the direction of the South Tower. The smoke is your point of reference. Here we go!For example, at 14 seconds into the video, we see a video shot from ABC showing a plane striking the south tower coming from the right. The smoke coming from the north tower is, of course, traveling over the south tower which is obstructed from view by the north tower. So from this camera angle, the smoke is going away from the camera. In stark contrast to what I wrote above, at 1:36 (1 min., 36 sec.) into the video, they show a different TV network showing the same event from a different camera angle. The smoke from the north tower is now going to the right (over the south tower as usual), and the plane that hits the south tower is again coming fro the right. Already there appears to be a problem with the angle of approach of the plane. Then, at 3:40 into the video, or 3 min., 40 sec. into the video, another network shows the same event, only this time the smoke is going to left (over the south tower like before, just from a different camera angle), and the plane that hits it is coming from the right! Take a look for yourselves.How can the plane that supposedly hit the south tower of the WTC be shown on different networks coming from different directions? It's starting to look like the plane is a computer graphic image that was superimposed onto the videos. Again, at about 5:50, or 5 min. and 50 sec. into the video, they show the Fox News footage of the second plane hitting the south tower. The camera angle is different again. The smoke is going over the south tower and traveling AWAY from the camera. In fact, the south tower is completely obscured by the north tower, and THE PLANE AGAIN COMES FROM THE RIGHT of the screen. WTF?When you look at the footage from the different networks, just remember that the smoke from the first tower to be hit is always traveling over the south tower of the WTC. Keep that in mind as a reference point, and you will quickly see what I mean. This may be evidence of some media hoaxing going on with regard to what really happened that day.Just remember, the smoke from the north tower is always going over and in the direction of the south tower. That is your reference point. You should quickly see what I mean. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lKZqqSI9-sThe link below is from a Fox News special called "9/11 As It Happened." At 2:42 in the video, or 2 min. and 42 sec. into the video, the camera angle shows the south tower totally obscured by the north tower and the smoke is traveling AWAY from the camera and over the obscured south tower. The plane, that appears black, comes from the right to hit the south tower.In contrast to this, at about 7:13 or 7 sec. and 13 sec. into the video they show what is supposed to be the same event but from a different camera angle. In this clip the smoke is traveling to the left and, as usual, in the direction of and over the south tower. In this clip, the plane is coming AT the camera and not even straight. It is descending while coming at the camera to hit the south tower. http://video.foxnews.com/v/4335916/911- ... appenedThe link below is from http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2009/09/11/ ... cks/Scroll down to the video clip called "Raw Video: The South Tower Is Hit (Sept. 11, 2001)"The camera angle shows the smoke going to the left and over the south tower, and the plane comes from the LEFT to hit the south tower. Then, right after that, they show the same "event" with the smoke going to the left and the plane coming from the RIGHT! http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2009/09/11/ ... ttacks/The meaning of this appears to be quite clear. The media was not only complicit in 9/11. It appears that they were a PART of what went on that day. It's one thing for the media to go to sleep AFTER a crime has been committed. It's quite another for the media to actively take PART in a murderous event.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

Remember, the smoke traveling in the direction of the south tower is your point of reference. This is amateur video take of the supposed plane that hit. Now the plane is coming at the tower from ANOTHER direction. Now it's traveling in the opposite direction, basically, as the smoke. ???http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XELamUnF0EU

[kenmurray]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

kenmurray wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbcKen,That's a very good post. It's about building 7 and the reporter, Jane Standley (sp?). What do you guys think about the evidence I presented that shows the same supposed plane hitting the south tower from different directions, which basically is very strong evidence that computer graphics were used by the media ON 9/11 to show a plane hitting the south tower?Take a look at the links I posted above. I even tell you where in the videos to look so you won't have to look at the ENTIRE videos. Comments?

[Bob]

The MSM was obviously complicit in the JFK assassination as well, and STILL are. That dark episode of American history has translated into what happened on 9/11 as well. There is no doubt in my mind that the MSM is guilty of covering up both of those events, as they are bed partners with the power elite and the people who actually committed those treasonous acts. The MSM is run by corporations now. This isn't the United States anymore...it's the United Corporations. The ruling by the Supreme Court in the Citizens United case makes that even more apparent, as corporations (domestic or foreign) can now give unlimited campaign funds to whomever, and keep that funding a secret. The recent elections showed what a terrible decision that was. So what we have here is this...the executive (CIA puppets in the White House), legislative (both parties controlled by lobbyists of corporations) and judicial (Scalia and Thomas are especially corrupt) branches of the U.S. government are controlled by the power elite and the corporations. The supposed 4th branch of the government...the MSM...is equally tarnished and bought off. It's been that way since Operation Mockingbird was put into place by the CIA, as they placed operatives within the MSM. The only way of getting out the truth to the people is via the internet. And the power elite is trying like hell to make that go away as well.

[kenmurray]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU&feature=fvst

[kenmurray]

Eyewitnesses Speak, Conspiracy Revealed:http://thepentacon.com/googlesmokinggun.htm

[mike martinez]

From the :14 second mark of the first link you provided I drew a plan view of the two towers and showed the wind direction in red pen and the appox location of the plane impact of the south tower with a blue pen.Then I used that drawing and went to every other time line you provided, oriented my drawing and the plane hit in the exact same place every time.Seriously??Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:Remember, the smoke traveling in the direction of the south tower is your point of reference. This is amateur video take of the supposed plane that hit. Now the plane is coming at the tower from ANOTHER direction. Now it's traveling in the opposite direction, basically, as the smoke. ???http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XELamUnF0EU

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

mike martinez wrote:From the :14 second mark of the first link you provided I drew a plan view of the two towers and showed the wind direction in red pen and the appox location of the plane impact of the south tower with a blue pen.Then I used that drawing and went to every other time line you provided, oriented my drawing and the plane hit in the exact same place every time.Seriously??That's wonderful.Can you show us that drawing you're talking about?I'm literally showing examples of how that plane was shown coming in different directions and approaches. You're talking about a drawing that you haven't shown. Please share it. In one of the clips, the plane is making a descending approach on the left and coming AT the camera. In other videos, the plane comes straight in. I'm showing it, and I really want to see this diagram you're talking about.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

mike martinez wrote:From the :14 second mark of the first link you provided I drew a plan view of the two towers and showed the wind direction in red pen and the appox location of the plane impact of the south tower with a blue pen.Then I used that drawing and went to every other time line you provided, oriented my drawing and the plane hit in the exact same place every time.Seriously??Mike Martinez,In this supposed amateur video that was accepted as authentic, the plane is traveling at the south tower almost in the OPPOSITE direction as the smoke is traveling. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XELamUnF0EUThe link below is from http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2009/09/11/ ... cks/Scroll down to the video clip called "Raw Video: The South Tower Is Hit (Sept. 11, 2001)"The camera angle shows the smoke going to the left and over the south tow.er, and the plane comes from the LEFT to hit the south tower. Then, right after that, they show the same "event" with the smoke going to the left and the plane coming from the RIGHT!http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2009/09/11/ ... attacks/In contrast to the straight approach of the planes as depicted in the other supposed real videos is this.At about 7:13 or 7 min. and 13 sec. into the video below they show what is supposed to be the same event but from a different camera angle. In this clip the smoke is traveling to the left and, as usual, in the direction of and over the south tower. In this clip, the plane is coming AT the camera and not even straight. It is descending while coming at the camera to hit the south tower.http://video.foxnews.com/v/4335916/911- ... appenedAre they really coming in at the same angles?