Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
kenmurray wrote:Pasquale, I know what you mean by those shoes. I guess the MSM wants us to believe that the bodies disintergrated. I guess so. LOL I'm kind of getting a laugh out of the image...plane crashing into a building and a bunch of shoes raining down on the pavement. WTF?
-
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Didn't you see the blood on the walk there?
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
I will say....the bag the officer is holding doesnt match his shoes
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Check out this very interesting blog...http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... xican.html
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Dealey Joe wrote:Didn't you see the blood on the walk there? Is it blood? I guess it might be.
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Jsnow915 wrote:I will say....the bag the officer is holding doesnt match his shoes HA HA HA HA!!!!
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Bob wrote:Check out this very interesting blog...http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... htmlThat's some good information there, Bob.Regarding the O'Neil issue, I'm open to the possibility. Also, regarding no plane hitting the Pentagon, it certainly coincides with the no-plane issue regarding WTC 7. I'm fairly certain that whatever did (or did not) hit the twin towers was NOT what the mainstream media (and those amateur videos) showed us on TV. Good stuff!
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:Bob wrote:Check out this very interesting blog...http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... htmlThat's some good information there, Bob.Regarding the O'Neil issue, I'm open to the possibility. Also, regarding no plane hitting the Pentagon, it certainly coincides with the no-plane issue regarding WTC 7. I'm fairly certain that whatever did (or did not) hit the twin towers was NOT what the mainstream media (and those amateur videos) showed us on TV. Good stuff!You may wish to note the historical knowledge of the outspoken Russian nuclear professional Dimitri Khalezov http://www.dkhalezov.com Deborah
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11
Deborah wrote:Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:Bob wrote:Check out this very interesting blog...http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... htmlThat's some good information there, Bob.Regarding the O'Neil issue, I'm open to the possibility. Also, regarding no plane hitting the Pentagon, it certainly coincides with the no-plane issue regarding WTC 7. I'm fairly certain that whatever did (or did not) hit the twin towers was NOT what the mainstream media (and those amateur videos) showed us on TV. Good stuff!You may wish to note the historical knowledge of the outspoken Russian nuclear professional Dimitri Khalezov http://www.dkhalezov.com DeborahDeborah,That's some good information you just posted. I'm still looking at it.The "nano-thermite" idea is something I'm having a problem with. I think the "nano-thermite" is a false lead. Some 9/11 truthers even talk about the supposed "nano-thermite" being painted on. It doesn't make any sense to me. I suspect that very non conventional explosives were used and perhaps in addition to the standard explosives used in controlled demolitions.Anywa, that's some good stuff you posted.