Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

JFK Assassination
Pasquale DiFabrizio
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

Post by Pasquale DiFabrizio »

kenmurray wrote:Pasquale, I know what you mean by those shoes. I guess the MSM wants us to believe that the bodies disintergrated. I guess so. LOL I'm kind of getting a laugh out of the image...plane crashing into a building and a bunch of shoes raining down on the pavement. WTF?
Dealey Joe
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

Post by Dealey Joe »

Didn't you see the blood on the walk there?
Jsnow915
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

Post by Jsnow915 »

I will say....the bag the officer is holding doesnt match his shoes
Bob
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

Post by Bob »

Check out this very interesting blog...http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... xican.html
Pasquale DiFabrizio
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

Post by Pasquale DiFabrizio »

Dealey Joe wrote:Didn't you see the blood on the walk there? Is it blood? I guess it might be.
Pasquale DiFabrizio
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

Post by Pasquale DiFabrizio »

Jsnow915 wrote:I will say....the bag the officer is holding doesnt match his shoes HA HA HA HA!!!!
Pasquale DiFabrizio
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

Post by Pasquale DiFabrizio »

Bob wrote:Check out this very interesting blog...http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... htmlThat's some good information there, Bob.Regarding the O'Neil issue, I'm open to the possibility. Also, regarding no plane hitting the Pentagon, it certainly coincides with the no-plane issue regarding WTC 7. I'm fairly certain that whatever did (or did not) hit the twin towers was NOT what the mainstream media (and those amateur videos) showed us on TV. Good stuff!
Deborah
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

Post by Deborah »

Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:Bob wrote:Check out this very interesting blog...http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... htmlThat's some good information there, Bob.Regarding the O'Neil issue, I'm open to the possibility. Also, regarding no plane hitting the Pentagon, it certainly coincides with the no-plane issue regarding WTC 7. I'm fairly certain that whatever did (or did not) hit the twin towers was NOT what the mainstream media (and those amateur videos) showed us on TV. Good stuff!You may wish to note the historical knowledge of the outspoken Russian nuclear professional Dimitri Khalezov http://www.dkhalezov.com Deborah
Pasquale DiFabrizio
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

Post by Pasquale DiFabrizio »

Deborah wrote:Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:Bob wrote:Check out this very interesting blog...http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/03 ... htmlThat's some good information there, Bob.Regarding the O'Neil issue, I'm open to the possibility. Also, regarding no plane hitting the Pentagon, it certainly coincides with the no-plane issue regarding WTC 7. I'm fairly certain that whatever did (or did not) hit the twin towers was NOT what the mainstream media (and those amateur videos) showed us on TV. Good stuff!You may wish to note the historical knowledge of the outspoken Russian nuclear professional Dimitri Khalezov http://www.dkhalezov.com DeborahDeborah,That's some good information you just posted. I'm still looking at it.The "nano-thermite" idea is something I'm having a problem with. I think the "nano-thermite" is a false lead. Some 9/11 truthers even talk about the supposed "nano-thermite" being painted on. It doesn't make any sense to me. I suspect that very non conventional explosives were used and perhaps in addition to the standard explosives used in controlled demolitions.Anywa, that's some good stuff you posted.
Post Reply