ALWAYS MONEY FOR WARFARE:

JFK Assassination
Post Reply
Bruce Patrick Brychek
Senior Member
Posts: 3703
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:53 am

ALWAYS MONEY FOR WARFARE:

Post by Bruce Patrick Brychek »

Sunday
07.23.2017
10:20 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time::

Dear Forum Members and Readers:

There is Always Money for Wars and Warfare.

THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE.

THERE IS NO MONEY IN HUMANITY and JUSTICE FOR "We the People..."

There has to be enough bombs and weapons to blow the World Up to dust from 100 - 1,000 times over.

Who wins ? Who fires first ?

WHY IS THERE NEVER ENOUGH MONEY FOR: for adequate law enforcement, the blind, the dead (pauper's fields), disabled, disease stricken, dying, elderly, education, first responders, floods, forest fires, homeless, hospitals, hospital care, hunger victims, infrastructure, job creation, poverty stricken, schools, sick, veteran's, etc., ?

BUT WE HAVE NO TROUBLE FINDING and SPENDING $12.9 BILLION ON A 100,000 TON AIR CRAFT CARRIER, and ALL OF THE RELATED and SUSTAINING COSTS ?

WILL THIS EXPENDITURE BRING OR IMPROVE WORLD PEACE ?

WHY CAN'T WE SPEND $12.9 BILLION ON A FLOATING CITY HOSPITAL FOR "We the People..." ?

THE BIGGEST LIE EVER TOLD TO "We the People..." IS THAT WE LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY.

TRUMP: USS FORD IS “100,000-TON MESSAGE TO THE WORLD:”

Darlene Superville, Associated Press, Associated Press 4 hours ago
NORFOLK, Va. (AP) --

With praise and a blessing for the military, President Donald Trump helped hand over the USS
Gerald R. Ford to the Navy on Saturday and said the state-of-the-art aircraft carrier will send
a "100,000-ton message to the world" about America's military might when it is ultimately
deployed.

U.S. allies will rest easy, Trump said, but America's enemies will "shake with fear" when they see the Ford cutting across the horizon.

The president, who is commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces, likened the $12.9 billion warship to "an incredible work of art" and boasted about the American labor that went into building a vessel that eventually will house thousands of sailors and crew members.Trump's participation in the ceremony also capped "Made in America" week at the White House, during which the president and administration officials sought to draw attention to the U.S. manufacturing industry."

American steel and American hands have constructed this 100,000-ton message to the world," Trump said of the Ford during a speech that praised the bravery and spirit of U.S. service members and referenced his desire for a buildup after years of spending restrictions."

American might is second to none and we're getting bigger and better and stronger every day of my administration. That I can tell you," Trump told thousands of service members and guests, including former defense secretaries Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, and Govs.

Terry McAuliffe of Virginia and Rick Snyder of Michigan, who were packed into the steamy hangar bay on the main deck."Wherever this vessel cuts through the horizon, our allies will rest easy and our enemies will shake with fear because everyone will know that America is coming, and America is coming strong," Trump said.

After the speech, he put the Ford into commission and asked God to "bless and guide this warship and all who shall sail in her."

He was followed by Susan Ford Bales, the ship's sponsor and daughter of the 38th president, whom the ship honors."There is no one, absolutely no one, who would be prouder of the commissioning of this mighty ship than the president of the United States, Gerald R. Ford," she said. "I am honored to give the command: 'Officers and crew of the United States Gerald R. Ford, man our ship and bring her to life.'"

"Anchors Aweigh" played as row after row of sailors in crisp, white uniforms who had been standing
in formation began filing off to man their stations. Sirens and bells sounded, horns blared and the U.S. flag was hoisted high above the deck.Soon after, the captain was informed that the "ship is manned and ready and reports for duty to the fleet."Trump, who visited the carrier in March, told Time magazine this year that the Navy should revert to using steam catapults to launch fighter jets because some of the USS Ford's state-of-the-art systems and technology "costs hundreds of millions of dollars more money and it's no good."Construction started in 2009 and was to be completed by September 2015 at a cost of $10.5 billion.

The Navy has blamed the delays and budget overruns on the ship's advanced systems and technology, including electromagnetic launch systems for jets and drones that will replace steam catapults.The warship also has a smaller island that sits farther back on the ship to make it quicker to refuel, re-arm and relaunch planes, and a nuclear power plant designed to allow cruising speeds of more than 30 knots and operation for 20 years without refueling.

The vessel completed sea trials in April but still will go through a battery of tests and workups at sea before becoming ready for deployment, work that is expected to cost nearly $780 million and take more than four years to complete, congressional auditors said this month.Docked at Naval Station Norfolk, the USS Ford eventually will house about 2,600 sailors, 600 fewer than the previous generation of aircraft carriers.

The Navy says that will save more than $4 billion over the ship's 50-year lifespan.

The air wing to support the Ford could add more personnel to the ship, which is designed to house
more than 4,600 crew members.The Ford was built at Newport News Shipbuilding, a giant Navy contractor in Virginia."

I was with you four months ago and I knew that I had to be here today and I told you I'd be back to congratulate you and the crew and everybody involved in commissioning the newest, largest and most advanced aircraft carrier in the history of this world," Trump said Saturday.

"That's a big achievement."Associated Press writer Steve McMillan in Richmond, Virginia, and Ben
Finley in Norfolk, Virginia, contributed to this report.Follow Darlene Superville on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dsupervilleap

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material
completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions
and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies,
thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation
of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?
Respectfully,
BB.
Slav
Senior Member
Posts: 4225
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:53 am

Re: ALWAYS MONEY FOR WARFARE:

Post by Slav »

I am really confused , were spending 39 billion on new war machines for new wars, what direction are we heading and why ? Because there is no profit in peace and only profit in war, so we can expect to see a lot of new wars taking place in the future with all this new hardware.http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-bu ... iles-16427
Slav
Senior Member
Posts: 4225
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:53 am

Re: ALWAYS MONEY FOR WARFARE:

Post by Slav »

Bruce P. Brychek
Global Moderator, Senior Member
Posts: 5065
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:53 am

ALWAYS MONEY FOR WARFARE:

Post by Bruce P. Brychek »

Wednesday
12.23.2020,
10:54 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK RFK MLK and Forum Members and Readers:

07.23.2017 - I originally Posted this important Headline and Supporting Material.

I just watched the evening news discussions about the Congress debating the giving
$600.00 too many of "We the People...", and Trump wants to make it $2,000.00.

It seems like everything has stalled.

Analyzing the drastic immediate effects on American's on the current on-going worsening
basis, there is No Coronavirus money currently available.

War anybody ?

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material
completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions
and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies,
thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation
of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?
Respectfully,
BB.
bspez
Senior Member
Posts: 1290
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:48 am

ALWAYS MONEY FOR WARFARE:

Post by bspez »

Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the assist in getting my login straightened out. I'm now bspez instead of bobspez.
Before I comment on your post, what happened to the old forum? Glad to see some members resettled on this new forum.
Regarding war, it may no longer be necessary to wage wars. The goal for the military industrial complex has always been to sell hardware to the US government at taxpayer expense. It doesn't have to be used. Ike presided over the buildup of an additional 14,000 or so nuclear weapons and all the associated delivery systems, including missiles, silos, bases, planes and submarines. But they were never used. In the past decade we have used over 5,000 drones, some costing more than a million dollars each. And they get destroyed after a single use, a perfect product to sell. I recall all those helicopters shoved off of air craft carriers at the fall of Saigon, and wondered how much they cost.
I was happy to vote for Biden but I have to give Trump credit for not starting or expanding any wars (knock on wood). I hope that will be a new trend in our foreign policy.
Bruce P. Brychek
Global Moderator, Senior Member
Posts: 5065
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:53 am

ALWAYS MONEY FOR WARFARE:

Post by Bruce P. Brychek »

Bob Spez glad I could assist. You are always a tremendously balanced source of facts, information,
insight and specifics.

No knowledge of prior matters for a long time from anybody, anywhere. I wish the best to everyone - everywhere.

I was contacted by one of the many people/groups of researcher's that I have long dealt w/.

They wanted to take a broader, newer, fresher, more connective approach from past, to present,
and through our "evolving future." They had me at "...more connective approach..."

Out w/ the old, in w/ the new, going forward, touching on the past when, where, if relevant,
but decidedly not dwelling, focusing and practically living in the past.

My Focus since 11.22.1963 has always been A Top Down Approach, and involving little interest
in The Bottom Up Approach.

Ultimately I agree w/ most people 75% of the time

Respectfully,
BB.
Post Reply