Strong Evidence Of Fake Planes And A Media Hoax On 9/11

[kenmurray]

Very good links Pasquale. Did you see Jesse Ventura's show on the Pentagon?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4QUEcf-TpY

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

kenmurray wrote:Very good links Pasquale. Did you see Jesse Ventura's show on the Pentagon?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4QUEcf-TpYNot yet, but now I will.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

Here's even more evidence of video tampering regarding 9/11.Here is video taken by one of those supposed bystanders, Mr. Hezarkhani, on 9/11. It seems that the audio of Hezarkhani in the video saying "Oh, my God..." etc., appears at about 7 seconds after the plane impact at first, and then much later in other news broadcasts, the "OMG" comment appears in the same video much later, like several seconds later. Go figure. LOL http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5i07-kHgwwThe link below has two audio clips of two phone calls made to Mr. Hezarkhani who supposedly took the video. He doesn't even say where he was when he took the video, and he refers the caller to contact CNN as he claims he can't even discuss where he was when he took the video. Interesting, eh? To the best of my knowledge, regarding Jeff Hill, beware that he is now done a 180 degree turn, like Gary Mack did. Jeff no longer supports the fake plane idea. http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/749535/1/The links below are of the two phone calls made by Jeff Hill of "pumpitout.com." call 1http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/mh_080307.mp3call 2http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/mh2_080307.mp3So, not only does the video, supposedly taken by Hezarkhani, show an aluminum plane going into the building with no deceleration or damage all, but the audio of the video is different in different news broadcasts.In addition, Hezarkhani doesn't even want to talk about where he was when he supposedly took the footage. He can't remember where he was? Was he even there?

[Ray Mitcham]

Hi Pasquale,The youtube address given is unavailable. It seems to have been removed (I wonder why?)You got it embedded?Cheers.

[kenmurray]

ABC reporter Dan Dahler saw no plane only an explosion:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA8xD9CF ... re=related

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

Ray Mitcham wrote:Hi Pasquale,The youtube address given is unavailable. It seems to have been removed (I wonder why?)You got it embedded?Cheers.Ray,I just clicked on it, and the link worked. ???

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

kenmurray wrote:ABC reporter Dan Dahler saw no plane only an explosion:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA8xD9CF ... elatedVery interesting, eh?

[kenmurray]

Thanks Pasquale.Check this out.Barrie Zwicker: 9/11 Media Cover up:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-u7vRoy ... re=related

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

kenmurray wrote:Thanks Pasquale.Check this out.Barrie Zwicker: 9/11 Media Cover up:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-u7vRoy ... elatedGood stuff, Ken.Actually, "media cover up," is being a little mild. For the rest of you, he is saying information that a lot us already knew, that the media was already planting stories within hours. So, now we have the the videos that were presented by the media showing video fakery, and we also have the media planting stories about the attacks as well within minutes. Most of us know about the man on the street wearing a Harley Davidson t-shirt. He was supposed to be just a bystander, and he actually explains how the towers came down the same way the "authorities" did later on. The only difference is that it took NIST a lot longer tan just a few minutes to come up with the official version of how the towers came down.Here is the "Harley guy" talking to a news reporter. This is evidence of a story being planted within minutes of the collapse of the towers. This innocent bystander who we call the "Harley guy" is wearing a black Harley Davidson t-shirt. He says to the news reported (I believe it's a Fox news reporter) that he witnessed a plane "come out of nowhere" and just "reamed" into the side of the tower. Then he said that he witnessed both towers collapse and that they collapsed "mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense." Huh? How the hell does he know this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0wHeekgPqkI'll put it another way. This man in the video, in my opinion, is an actor put there by the perpetrators. How the hell did he know why the towers collapsed? It was not exactly a normal occurrence. In fact, steel framed buildings like those towers collapsing because of fire and an airplane impact was never even expected. If it was such a normal occurrence for those buildings to have collapsed at free-fall speed (110 stories in 10 seconds), what were so many firemen doing in the building? What I mean is this: Why were so many firemen caught off guard and killed when those buildings collapsed? It's because it was the last thing they expected, and yet this innocent bystander who happened to talk to a Fox news reporter talks about the collapse of the towers like it's no big deal and was to be expected. I smell a rat. So, the "Harley guy" in my opinion was a plant, a planted "witness" who would start planting the story of how the buildings collapsed that just so happened to match what NIST said much later. Interesting eh? So, what do the rest of you think about the mainstream media now? Kind of puts a bad taste in your mouth, eh? This is the same media who went to sleep about 9/11 and who went to sleep about JFK and James Files. Again, great links, Ken!

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:kenmurray wrote:Thanks Pasquale.Check this out.Barrie Zwicker: 9/11 Media Cover up:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-u7vRoy ... elatedGood stuff, Ken.Actually, "media cover up," is being a little mild. It looks like media PARTICIPATION in the 9/11 false flag operation. For the rest of you, Barrie Zwuicker (shown in the links that Ken provided) is saying information that a lot of us already knew, that the media was already planting stories within hours of the attacks...actually within minutes!So, now we have the the videos that were presented by the media showing video fakery, and we also have the media planting stories about the attacks as well and within minutes. Most of us know about the man on the street wearing the Harley Davidson t-shirt who was interviewed on 9/11. We call him the "Harley guy" or the "Harley t-shirt guy." He was supposed to be just an average bystander, and yet he actually explains how the towers came down the same way the "authorities" did later on in their official report that we can wipe our butts with. The only difference is that it took NIST a lot longer than just a few minutes to come up with the official version of how the towers came down. The "Harley t-shirt guy" says the same nonsense story about the collapse of the twin towers within minutes! HUH? The link below shows the "Harley guy" talking to a news reporter. This is evidence of a story being planted within minutes of the collapse of the towers. This innocent bystander who we call the "Harley guy" is wearing a black Harley Davidson t-shirt. He says to the news reported (I believe it's a Fox news reporter) that he witnessed a plane "come out of nowhere" and just "reamed" into the side of the tower. Then he said that he witnessed both towers collapse and that he believes that the reason for the collapse of both towers was "mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense." Huh? How the hell does he know this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0wHeekgPqkI'll put it another way. This man in the video, in my opinion, is an actor put there by the perpetrators. Of course the news reporter just happened to find him too, eh? How the hell did that clown know why the towers collapsed? Didn't it take all those supposed experts in NIST a lot longer to come up with that fairy tale? The collapse was not exactly a normal occurrence. In fact, steel framed buildings like those towers collapsing because of fire and an airplane impact was never even expected. If it was such a normal occurrence for those buildings to have collapsed at FREE FALL SPEED (110 stories in 10 seconds), what were so many firemen doing in the building? What I mean is this: Why were so many firemen caught off guard and killed when those buildings collapsed? It's because it was the last thing they expected, and yet this innocent bystander who happened to talk to a Fox news reporter talks about the collapse of the towers like it's no big deal and was to be expected. I smell a rat. So, the "Harley guy" in my opinion was a plant, a planted "witness" who would start planting the story of how the buildings collapsed that just so happened to match what NIST said much later. Interesting eh? So, what do the rest of you think about the mainstream media now? Kind of puts a bad taste in your mouth, eh? This is the same media that went to sleep about 9/11 and who went to sleep about JFK and James Files. So, here's another question. What is the profile of the people who basically dominate the media? Here's a clue. Take a look at the topic I started called "Israeli Involvement in 9/11 and Spying on the U.S." I'll be more specific later on. Again, great links, Ken!