WHY IS THE PRESS IGNORING THE CLINTON RUSSIA SCANDAL ?

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

12.03.2017:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:WHY IS THE MEDIA IGNORING THE CLINTON - OBAMA - RUSSIA - FBI SCANDAL ?We can't get the Real Time Truth's on these matter's.HOW CAN "We the People..." EVER EXPECT TO GET THE REAL TRUTH'S ON THE REMOVAL'S OF JFK, MX, MLK, AND RFK, THE OKLAHOMA BOMBING, 09.11.2001, THE MOON LANDING, etc. " (12.03.2017, BB.)The Russia Scandal Just Got Much Worse … For Hillary Clinton And Barack Obama6:20 PM ETCorruption: Shortly after the Uranium One story broke, various news reports claimed that it was much ado about nothing. But a review of a huge cache of newly available documents shows that, if anything, it was worse than previously thought.Autoplay: On | OffThe Hill broke the bombshell story last month, which summed up goes like this: While the Obama administration was approving the controversial 2010 sale of Uranium One to a state-owned Russian energy giant — which gave it control of one-fifth of U.S. uranium supplies — the FBI was actively investigating that company for extensive criminal activity designed to expand Russia's footprint in the U.S. uranium business.This raised questions about who in the Obama administration was aware of the FBI's evidence — which included bribery, extortion and racketeering — before greenlighting the sale. Officials involved denied knowing anything about the investigation at the time.Now a cache of documents 5,000 pages long, which were reviewed by The Hill, sheds new and more troubling light on this story.The documents detail work done by undercover informant Douglas Campbell, who was paid nearly $200,000 for his cooperation with the FBI while he was working as a lobbyist on behalf of a Russian company. The Justice Department had previously barred Campbell from telling anyone about his work, a gag order it lifted only after the initial Hill story ran.Among the revelations contained in these documents:Campbell had documented a bribery/kickback scheme by Russian officials in the U.S. more than a year before Obama approved the Uranium One sale.He also "relayed detailed information about criminal conduct throughout 2010."Campbell was directly solicited by Russian officials to help overcome political opposition from Republicans to the Uranium One sale.He regularly told his FBI handlers about what The Hill describes only as a "Washington entity with close ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton," which was paid millions to help expand Russia's U.S. uranium business and "began increasing its financial support" to the Clinton Foundation.Russia saw the Uranium One purchase as part of a long-term strategy to dominate energy markets and make the U.S. more dependent on Russia's nuclear fuel.Russians used "racially tinged insults to boast about how easy they found it to win uranium business under Obama."It's important to note that all this transpired while Obama was embarking on his ill-fated Russian "reset" — in which he tried to make nice with Russia, and during which his administration not only approved the Uranium One sale but made other rulings favorable to Russian energy interests.Adding further intrigue to the story is the fact that not only did the FBI keep a lid on its investigation for years, officials at Justice tried to downplay Campbell's significance as an informant and dispute that he had any information about the Uranium One deal after the initial story broke last month. As The Hill notes, the documents it reviewed directly contradict those claims.One can only speculate why Justice officials would be doing this now.Despite its potentially far-reaching ramifications, the Uranium One story has so far barely registered with the public, thanks to a near total news blackout from the mainstream press.When the IBD/TIPP Poll asked about the Uranium One scandal in the latest monthly survey, only 48% said they had been following it closely.But with investigations underway in the House and Senate, and with Campbell free to talk to lawmakers about what he knew, even the liberal press might not be able to ignore this story for much longer.RELATED:Senate Investigates Russia, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Uranium And Bribes — And It's About TimeObama Administration, Hillary Clinton Covered Up Their Deep, Corrupt Ties To RussiaWhy Is The Press Ignoring The Exploding Clinton-Russia-FBI Scandal?© 2000-2017 Investor's Business Daily, Inc. All rights reservedAs always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

[Slav]

https://www.google.ca/amp/thehill.com/o ... orts%3famp

[Slav]

https://www.google.ca/amp/www.foxnews.c ... p.amp.html

[Bob]

We know Hillary is corrupt. There is absolutely no doubt about that. But she is not the President. Trumplethinskin is. And more and more evidence is being produced that the Donald has always been a con man and always will be a con man. An unethical con man at that. The Mike Flynn guilty plea and the fact that he has or will sing like a bird about Trump and his minions (like Jared, Donny Jr., Pence and Sessions) colluding with Mother Russia will soon become crystal clear. This is why Trump fired James Comey. The Donald "asked" Comey to not investigate the former National Security Advisor Flynn. Comey refused and was fired. Why? The road led to Trump himself colluding with Russia. But that firing led to Robert Mueller being named special prosecutor. Which led us to where we are now. And trust me, many more dominoes will fall.Between Flynn and Paul Manafort, Humpty Trumpty is going to be in the Mueller frying pan for at least a couple of charges. Obstruction of justice and money laundering, especially when it's Jared's turn to start singing.So, what does this all mean? Like I said before the 2016 Presidential election, the voters were put in a lose-lose situation. The two very worst candidates that either party could offer. Both are as dirty as they come. This is why a third-party has to come out of this somehow. And that is why I am an Independent.Yes, Hillary has and always will continue her nefarious ways. But the Donald is right up there with her and has been dealing with Russian interests (see money laundering and loans) for over 20 years.And it is he who is the President.