Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

[Kathy Becket]

I fail to see any strawman arguments here. And I brought up what books I bought because someone said the Museum does not carry conspiracy books, and i was informing them that it did. Now I am being asked what other books they carry--I don't know. Those were the two I had picked out to purchase. First i was just going to buy the Wrone book and I saw "Brothers", so I picked it up. Like I said in my last post, I do not know what else they carry!! I did not peruse the place.First someone says, why doesn't the bookstore sell conspiracy books, and i told them it did. Now i must give an inventory account? I bring up those 2 because i personally bought them and can attest to it.Groden sells his work at the site of the grassy knoll all the time,so there would be no need to carry them at the bookstore, I would think.As for what I believe and Lancer, I fail to see a connection. Lancer is a research forum, and anyone can join. Alot of people post with alot of differing opinions.And I don't by any means limit myself there. My home turf is the Ed Forum. There are tons of materials available on Files. See, the funny thing is, if I don't believe it, I am spreading disinfo, according to you, because you believe it. I don't call you a disinfo agent for your beliefs. There are alot of folks who don't put credence in his story. Are they all disinfo agents? No.There are too many things Files says that I don't believe. I don't have the Posner book, so I cannot tell you what i think of it. It doesn't look like something that i wish to own--there are an infinite amount of JFK books that I would love to have, but my budget is finite. And as to me being surprised at the tenor of the postings here, with the little jabs and such,well, perhaps, that is Lancer's fault. I think they may hold to a higher standard (sorry, that is the way the Administrator is), and posts such as the two posts above this one would not be tolerated. My bad for even saying anything about them in the first place. You know, like they say, when in Rome....

[ThomZajac]

Kathy,I am curious as to what you think happened in Dallas on November 22, 1963. Having read your recent posts I have some idea, but I don't like to make assumptions. I have no intention of attempting to change your mind in the event we see things much differently, but I am interested in better understanding why some thoughtful people have reached certain conclusions.Sincerely,Thom

[saracarter766]

WTF such posts would'nt be tolerated you say kathy?and pardon my french but at least we who have more sense and intelligence don't go about kissing gary macks ass like you do.and the snotty comment about lancer holding to a higher standard you can take you higher standards and shove them where the friggin don't shine hun.and lancer is as boring as horse hockey and thank god i do not go on there anymore you pretty much lost all my respect mrs kathy becket with that higher standard comment. sorry about that peeps but her comments make me so mad. and i'd rather be on this forum then lancer it's more fun the people here are awesome and at least the peeps here don't have their nose so far up their keister like you do kathy beckett it's a real yawnfest at lancer and that's all i'm saying.

[katisha]

ThomZajac wrote:Kathy,I am curious as to what you think happened in Dallas on November 22, 1963. Having read your recent posts I have some idea, but I don't like to make assumptions. I have no intention of attempting to change your mind in the event we see things much differently, but I am interested in better understanding why some thoughtful people have reached certain conclusions.Sincerely,ThomA fine post, Thom. I too would like to hear what Kathy thinks. Not that I'll necessarily agree with her (and I know she, like many of the people here, knows much more about it all than I do), but it's a pleasure to see intelligent debate and passionate, yet civilized, argument about something we all care deeply about. Please keep it up, Kathy, Bob, Pasquale et al. I look forward to reading more from all of you.

[kenmurray]

I would like to know Kathy since you said you bought that "inside the target" dvd, What is your opinion of it? Do you think it was an accurate display it shown with their expert rifeman with an aligned scope that he had pretending to be Oswald and shooting at a STATIONARY target? Did that occur on Nov 22, 1963? Hell no it didn't! By most accounts that cheap Carcano that Oswald allegedly used, the scope was MIISALIGNED and JFK''s limo was NOT stationary. Plus I didn't see no tree in sight of their rifleman named Yardley! Gary Mack was involved in this absurd piece of garbage! Yeah, sure Mack wants to keep this case alive, by burying the truth and promote the SBT now! Just watch a part of this documentary and see why we get pissed at Mack "the sack": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULJ1KvmqbF0

[saracarter766]

oswald would have to drink 40 maybe 50 red bull energy drinks to run up to the sixth floor and then after that get 3 shots off and go back down to the 2 floor and remain calm.lol my fellow JFK buffs just being a smartass there haha.

[Kathy Becket]

Thom and Katisha,Thank you so much for your comments.A forum is, or should be, a vehicle for the free exchange of ideas. Since I put my Gary Mack opinion here, I have been told that my opinions are strawmen, and that I am more or less, a victim of Lancer disinformation, that I am spreading it , and told to cram things "where the sun don't shine". Seriously, how is this conducive to any research?For these reasons, I am not real excited about further posting any views I have because, I assume, the same will continue. Would YOU continue? I don't think I want to. Kathy

[Bob]

Kathy, things can get volatile and emotional on ALL forums. I have dropped in on a few other JFK forums just to peruse and I would rate this forum as being the most friendly. Gary Mack is a sore subject around here, but let's just put that aside for now. I would be interested as Thom says, to get your opinion about how the assassination happened. Who were the assassins or the assassin? Who were the conspirators...if any?

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

saracarter766 wrote:oswald would have to drink 40 maybe 50 red bull energy drinks to run up to the sixth floor and then after that get 3 shots off and go back down to the 2 floor and remain calm.lol my fellow JFK buffs just being a smartass there haha. Hey Sara! Well, I see no hard evidence....oh, never mind! LMAO Sorry, I had another Mack-the-Sack attack!

[saracarter766]

kathy hun be thankful that all i said was shove it where the sun cause it could've been alot worse but i have so much respect for Bob and Wim that i won't disrespect them there two of finest people on the web.now if it offended you then i do apologize but i won't apologize for standing my ground and sticking to my guns i'm sorry but that is the way it is with me. just be thankful that was a PG rated comment kathy.