CONTROL OF THE POPULATION vs. CRIME CONTROL...

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

01.27.2018:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:CONTROL OF THE POPULATION AND POPULATION CONTROL vs. CRIME CONTROL, DRUG CONTROL, POVERTY CONTROL, AND ANY AND ALL BENEFITS TO THE SINCERELY NEEDY, i.e., DISABLED VETERANS, DISABLED CITIZENS, EDUCATION, ELDERLY, MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED IN ANY AND ALL WAYS, etc., the INFRASTRUCTURE, the ENVIRONMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND POLLUTION CONTROLS, etc. Feel free to add your own."We the People..." are having our hard earned tax dollars spent on almost NOTHING that benefits them, and EVERYTHING that controls them.And nothing is being said or done about it.WHERE'S DEMOCRACY AT WORK ?WHERE'S THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA ?WHERE ARE ALL OF THE MAJOR CHURCH AND RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS ?ISN'T THIS WHERE THE AGENDA'S OF JFK, MX, MLK, and RFK WOULD HAVE FOCUSED PROPERLY HAD THEY LIVED ? (01.27.2018, BB).HOUSE PASSES BILL TO RENEW NSA INTERNET SPYING TOOL:Reuters Reuters, January 11, 2018An illustration picture shows the logo of the U.S. National Security Agency on the display of an iPhone in Berlin, June 7, 2013. REUTERS/Pawel KopczynskiBy Dustin Volz(Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday passed a bill to renew the National Security Agency's warrantless internet surveillance program, overcoming objections from privacy advocates and confusion prompted by morning tweets from President Donald Trump that initially questioned the spying tool.The legislation, which passed 256-164 and split party lines, is the culmination of a yearslong debate in Congress on the proper scope of U.S. intelligence collection - one fueled by the 2013 disclosures of classified surveillance secrets by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.Senior Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives had urged cancellation of the vote after Trump appeared to cast doubt on the merits of the program, but Republicans forged ahead.Trump initially said on Twitter that the surveillance program, first created in secret after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and later legally authorized by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, had been used against him but later said it was needed.Some conservative, libertarian-leaning Republicans and liberal Democrats attempted to persuade colleagues to include more privacy protections. They failed on Thursday to pass an amendment to include a warrant requirement before the NSA or other intelligence agencies could scrutinize communications belonging to Americans whose data is incidentally collected.The bill as passed by the House would extend the NSA's spying program for six years with minimal changes. Some privacy groups said it would actually expand the NSA's surveillance powers.Most lawmakers expect it to become law, although it still would require Senate approval and Trump's signature.Before the vote a tweet from Trump had contradicted the official White House position and renewed unsubstantiated allegations that the previous administration of Barack Obama improperly surveilled his campaign during the 2016 election."This is the act that may have been used, with the help of the discredited and phony Dossier, to so badly surveil and abuse the Trump Campaign by the previous administration and others?" the president said in a tweet."WE NEED IT!"The White House did not immediately respond to a request to clarify Trump’s tweet but he posted a clarification less than two hours later."With that being said, I have personally directed the fix to the unmasking process since taking office and today’s vote is about foreign surveillance of foreign bad guys on foreign land. We need it! Get smart!" Trump tweeted.Unmasking refers to the largely separate issue of how Americans' names kept secret in intelligence reports can be revealed.Asked by Reuters at a conference in New York about Trump's tweets, Rob Joyce, the top White House cyber official, said there was no confusion within Oval Office about the value of the surveillance program and that there have been no cases of it being used improperly for political purposes.The White House, U.S. intelligence agencies and Republican leaders in Congress have said they consider the tool indispensable and in need of little or no revision.Without congressional action, legal support for Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which authorizes the program, will expire next week, although intelligence officials say it could continue through April.Section 702 allows the NSA to eavesdrop on vast amounts of digital communications from foreigners living outside the United States through U.S. companies such as Facebook Inc (FB.O), Verizon Communications Inc (VZ.N) and Alphabet Inc's (GOOGL.O) Google.The spying program also incidentally scoops up communications of Americans if they communicate with a foreign target living overseas, and can search those messages without a warrant.As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

[bobspez2]

There used to be a saying years ago that would be considered politically incorrect today, that children and horses needed to be broken. The idea was that children and horses had to learn to submit to discipline in order to be useful to themselves and others. When I Googled that phrase I got zero hits. Like politically incorrect words removed from the dictionaries in Orwell's novel, 1984, it seems to have been erased, at least by Google. However, that control or breaking is very real and starts the first day of kindergarten or pre school and continues until the day you die. If you fight the established views and accepted paths from school to the world of work you generally are penalized in many ways, socially and economically. As children, we were immersed in schoolwork, religion, and belief in the honorable intentions of government, academia, medicine, the police, the armed forces, the media, and all those corporations who advertised products and sold them to us. As we got older we were further molded by our jobs and bosses to keep marching forward, being productive, improving our standard of living, and hopefully making it to that dreamed for life of leisure called retirement. Money for nothing and our checks for free, and our time is our own.This is all a roundabout way of saying that I don't think it's the government or taxes that keeps us "enslaved", it's society as a whole, with every part of it urging us continually to follow the rules, keep working hard, earn and spend money, and we can earn a comfortable niche in which to live out our lives if we do.I would say we as middle class people probably live better than ever in history due to technology. People talk about the prosperity of the 1950's but that prosperity didn't get experienced by most people. What we take for granted, kings and queens couldn't even imagine a few hundred years ago. Widespread disease, starvation, lack of shelter, servitude and daily abuse are not the norm, at least for our own polulation, as it sometimes was in the past. If you "keep your nose clean" you are not likely to be incarcerated, you no longer can be drafted, there are places where you can get a meal or shelter regardless of your situation, and there's minimum wage jobs available as entry into the work force, as well as opportunities for education and better paying jobs down the line. There is more skepticism about the aims and intentions of government, academia, religion, medicine, the military, the police, than ever before thanks to cell phones and the internet. While many still willingly close their eyes and ears, it does seem at least as if the tide is turning.Is the glass half full or half empty? It's always depended on how you look at it. Is there a deep state, an "illuminati", an establishment of the wealthy and powerful making the rules, writing the laws, with the intention of maintaining their own wealth and power, financed by the work of the masses? It seems obvious that there is since they have been doing things that way since the days of the pyramids in nearly every place and time for as long as civilizations have existed on earth. Are there more opportunities for most of us, the cogs in the big machine, to live lives that are relatively free and enjoyable? I believe so. Are we under more surviellance than ever in history? Yes. But we are also hundreds of millions of people communicating trillions of emails, postings, texts, phone calls, video and audio streams, etc. We are like individual stars in galaxies of digital data. I think the benefits of the technology outweigh the potential risks. If and when potential risks become actual harm, I believe people will be in a position to address and solve those problems, as they have in the past.

[Slav]

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02461037

[Slav]

http://www.sheldensays.com/crime_control_industry.htm