Page 2 of 3
Re: Who of you has a website?
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:14 pm
by dankbaar
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I did not write or send this email. I will look into this, so far I have no clue what's going on. Has Mike Narrett responded? Pennyworth wrote:I just received this e-mail...doesn't sound like something Wim would write to me..hello‏From:
dank@xs4all.nl Sent: Wed 3/04/09 7:51 PM To: Pennyworth (
paul72w@hotmail.com) Hello MikeNarrett, The following is an e-mail sent to you by Pennyworth via your account on"JFK Murder Solved". If this message is spam, contains abusive or othercomments you find offensive please contact the webmaster of the board atthe following address:
dank@xs4all.nl Include this full e-mail (particularly the headers). Please note that thereply address to this e-mail has been set to that of Pennyworth. Message sent to you follows~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ welcome aboard..where are you from?
Re: Who of you has a website?
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:16 pm
by dankbaar
Martin, not sure what you mean with this: Bob, the silence of Wim might came from this source:
http://www.manuscriptservice.com/Headst ... TEMENTFrom Allan Eaglesham.Silence is always not a good sign.Read in particular the first line above the first picture.Allan published some time ago a correspondence between him and Wimrelated to mid/late February which is now removed from all boards.Looks like an agreement.Martin
Re: Who of you has a website?
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:30 pm
by Martin Hinrichs
dankbaar wrote:Martin, not sure what you mean with this: My main intention was to bring you back to your forum and the people here, Wim. ThanksMartin
Re: Who of you has a website?
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:08 pm
by Pennyworth
Extracted from the above link;There are malicious bots (and botnets) of the following types: Spambots that harvest email addresses from contact forms or guestbook pages
Re: Who of you has a website?
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:38 pm
by bob franklin
Paul, I plugged "mike narrett" into an internet anagram server the other day (I have the same misgivings about this individual) & it spat out a veritable laundry list of anagrams. Some were ironic, some not. The thing that struck me was the sheer number them. Here's the link, try it:
http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/I think this is part of his/her/their fun, aside from the disruption itself. Any time I get suspicious of a new member I do this straight off. We need all the tools we can get to fight these people, IMO.
Re: Who of you has a website?
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:43 pm
by Pennyworth
The first thing that I can say for now is that Wim get better back-up and security on his encrypted program, and ban MSN bot media from this board.The hacker has already harvested Wim's e-mail addressThe whole board could be next to be hacked
Re: Who of you has a website?
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:04 pm
by bob franklin
& most probably all of ours as well. Think I'll do a full sweep of my own box, make sure I didn't pick anything up. Others may wanna do the same.
Re: Who of you has a website?
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:22 pm
by Bob
Pennyworth wrote:The first thing that I can say for now is that Wim get better back-up on and security on his encrypted program, and ban MSN bot media from this board.The hacker has already harvested Wim's e-mail addressThe whole board could be next to be hackedI have seen MSM bot media on line several times. I mean SEVERAL. Chris and I talked about that once. I also know that I never received emails that Wim sent me either a few weeks ago. Something is up.
Re: Who of you has a website?
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 12:32 pm
by dankbaar
It is indeed odd that MikeNarret dis nor responds since this discussion about him has started. I have banned him until he gives me confirmation of his identity. Wim
Re: Who of you has a website?
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:06 pm
by ChristophMessner
I reported Bob about "MSNbotMedia", whose profile I could not open, on Feb 10th. I wondered how somebody can post on this forum while nothing opens when clicking on his name. It was pale grey, not blue.