JFK RFK MLK Assassination Forum

Yeah thats cool cheers Randy and Bob.Hmmmm fascinating stuff but in a sense Bob, Randy and Ken I feel theres just a certain inevitability to it all lol and hey a lot of big name researchers have had letters from spooks encouraging them to write in a certain way. Its par for the course.But whats interesting with this is the stuff about Lopez Bob. That for me is the key to this document. I can imagine them wanting to dig up the dirt on Lopez and Hardaway because as you know their report on Mexico city blew everyone away. Whats funny here of course is that by 1986 the report had almost been suppressed some 8 or so years. Fascinating. Now it wasnt until the ARRB got hold of it that we knew the full contents of the report but even then they went through BS in 1995-1996 when it came out and it was redacted heavily. It wasnt until 2002/03 that it was released unredacted for common consumption. It's damn advised reading. I'll grab it make mention of Randys letter and put up a new post.

Randy Bednorz wrote:Seamus -- If you mean "where are the pages of the Phillips-Bugliosi letter of 1986, I posted them in the OPERATION ZIPPER thread.DiEugenio told me in an e-mail that I shouldn't publicize them too much -- they were an important discovery.I had a 3.1 megapixel Olympus camera, and a month to split between NARA and Library of Congress. The camera had maybe 900 MB of storage -- at that time, the largest XD memory you could get for it. So I was rationing my snaps. For instance, I mentioned in OZ the unpublished Phillips manuscript "Double Blind" which I'd found in the Phillips boxes at LoC. It was "mostly written" by James Phillips, according to Dave Phillips' son in the handwritten note he'd added to the file. So I didn't attempt to grab facsimiles of that manuscript. And frankly -- I don't think there's much there.If Phillips chose the title "Double Blind," then the manuscript could be a ruse. Either way, the books he managed to get published would be more important.When I was going through those files, I was interested in the law-suit, and snapped the Bugliosi letter. Then I literally forgot about it until a few weeks ago -- when I found it on my hard disk. And it's odd, really. The Phillips papers have been in LoC for close to 15 years or more. Nobody was interested enough to find it before 2004, and it would've been Bugliosi's undoing (perhaps) if they had. Can you imagine a book reviewer, knowledgeable about Phillips, reviewing "Reclaiming History" when it was first published in 2007? That would've been devastating . . . . to Bugliosi.No cheers man great stuff this is important. Great work. Sorry I have been so absorbed in my own stuff recently I havent had time to really take a look into things as I usually would. I'll hold off on giving it any publicity till you get the Okay from Big D.

10.19.2013Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:12.09.2009 - Mr. Ken Murray Posted the second part of this attentiongetting Headline.An interesting discussion continued to evolve by some of the best JFKMurder Solved Forum Members.As I have often stated I think that Jack Ruby was much more of a casualconnection to the JFK Assassination than many realize.This should be considered in conjunction with the other Headlines and Postsabout Jack Ruby and LHO here on the JFK Murder Solved Forum.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research,studies, thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this subject matter ?Comments ?Respectfully,BB.