LHO, AJH, OHL? Who are these guys

[kenmurray]

From John Armstrong:http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.ba ... facts.html

[Dealey Joe]

Thanks Ken.John spends a lot of time on this.What do you think?

[Phil Dragoo]

Jim DiEugenio and Lisa Pease devoted pages 91-135 of The Assassinations to John Armstrong's essay Harvey and Lee: The Case for Two Oswalds, Parts I & II.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxn_nZlKuPgHaving just received JFKTU I note Jim DiEugenio in his review states "On the assassination side, Douglass makes good use of that extraordinary feat of research Harvey and Lee by John Armstrong"My links to various aspects of Armstrong keep disappearing--another case of being over the target and taking flak.John Carman (before being framed by our Feds in 2007 http://narcosphere.narconews.com/node/1018 ) told me Craig Roberts (coauthor with John Armstrong of The Dead Witnesses) said Armstrong has everything to back up every word, a virtual Great Wall of data, including thousands upon thousands of FOIA document pages.

[Michael Calder]

Ken Murray,I read with interest the John Armstrong article you posted, "Harvey and Lee." Thanks for posting it. I've forever thought the Lee Oswald who returned from the Soviet Union was different than the one who entered the Marine Corps. Here is what bothers me. Photographs in the Warren Commission documents clearly show Marguerite's Lee with Marina in the Soviet Union. Yet Marina arrives in the U.S. with a different Lee. What does it mean if she is dating one Lee, the baby faced one, yet marrying and having children with the other. Perhaps baby face Lee was known by Marina by a different name. This is one area that bothers me. Has someone more clever than me figured this out. www.jfkcia.com

[Dealey Joe]

I read Johns article and as far as I can see it is a quotes of who said what.he does a good job of sorting out who saw what and maybe when.altho interesting he does not state for fact that any of the info is hard fact.I still say that the reason we need two or three LHO's is to explain what we cannot. I say that LHO's passion in life was to be a double or tripple agent. I believe he was.If we discount about 80% of what "WITNESSES" say we are right back where we were.I do not for a minuit belive there wer two LHO's running around Oak Cliff the afternoon of 11-22-1963I do believe there were two involved in the affair that day, LHO and the guy who was there to kill LHO andended up killing Tippit as he most likley knew him.I think we can show by time anallysis that this is most probableI have spent a lot of time working with the maps to plot this out and it fits vert well.my .02

[kenmurray]

More from John Armstrong:http://www.jfkresearch.com/jfk_101.html

[Dealey Joe]

Thanks Ken, this is very thought provoking and interesting.far fetched as it sounds I can see some merrit in it.he may be onto something here

[Phil Dragoo]

Ken, great summary by Armstrong at your link. The 100 binders of which he speaks had become "a wall of binders" in coauthor Craig Roberts' description to John Carman.I don't know if you've seen this by Armstrong:http://www.ctka.net/pr198-jfk.htmlHarvey, Lee and Tippit: A New Look at the Tippit ShootingBy John ArmstrongWe know Angleton had a 201 on Oswald ca. 1960, I believe, from the work of John Newman, author of Oswald and the CIA.Of course Oswald was sent to "defect" as one of two dozen penetration agents in the ONI op.But wheels within wheels, and CIA was ready to create a "Communist" patsy for future use.And use him they did.

[kenmurray]

Here is a segment from "Evidence of Revision", the best documentary I've ever seen. Look at smiling Will Fritz in the first clip.Listen to the initial police reports about a possible Ruby/Oswald connection and Will Fritz's reaction to Oswald being shot:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2_qy8_S ... relatedFor those of you that are newcomers to the forum, here is is the complete documentary in its' entirety:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... on+5&hl=en#