JFK RFK MLK Assassination Forum

Thanks Ken,That is good know. I have always respected Mark Lane. I want to give him the benefit of the doubt because he deserves it, but it is pretty strange.Kirk

Kirk wrote:Thanks Ken,That is good know. I have always respected Mark Lane. I want to give him the benefit of the doubt because he deserves it, but it is pretty strange.KirkKirk, it is strange. But it will be interesting on what Lane says about it tonight.

Agreed Ken,You all turned me on to BOR. I heard about it before, but had not taken the time before reading everybody's thoughts about it.Kirk

I think Mr. Lane on Black Op, has done a good job explaining his position.Maybe Posner will see the error of his ways and thinking before this is over.

Dealey Joe wrote:I think Mr. Lane on Black Op, has done a good job explaining his position.Maybe Posner will see the error of his ways and thinking before this is over.I was comfortable with Mark Lane's response as to why he is representing Gerald Posner. Also, as Thom said earlier in this thread...Posner says, "Although I'm convinced Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated President Kennedy, I've always believed that had Mark Lane represented Oswald, he would have won an acquittal. That's why Mark Lane was the obvious choice as my own attorney."Doesn't this strongly imply that Posner is admitting that he's guilty? That tells you a lot. Lane also said that he will not only represent Posner as an attorney, but will also try to convince Posner that the JFK assassination was a conspiracy (if pigs could fly ). Lane seems to think Posner is a nice guy, compared to someone like Vincent Bugliosi. By the way, Bugliosi had some pretty interesting clients himself in his past. Clients that may have played a role regarding his take on the JFK assassination. Right Vince?

Posner can always go back on Chris Mathews show and play ' Softball"

kenmurray wrote:Posner can always go back on Chris Mathews show and play ' Softball" Chris Matthews is such a fraud, just like most of his guests. When Matthews has real informed guests that want to tell the truth about things that are REALLY happening in the world, Matthews cuts them off...especially if they seem to not concur with his opinions. Matthews was for the war in Iraq, before it became popular to be against it. Now Matthews acts like he was ALWAYS against the war. Matthews always acts like he is always for the Kennedy legacy and what they have meant to the U.S. and the world, but he always slips in an out and out lie about them. Like saying JFK was for the war in Vietnam, when he talked about RFK's run for the Presidency in 1968. It was truly EMBARRASSING when Matthews gushed over Posner's book Case Closed. That told me all I needed to know about Matthews. That and his continuing stance that the commie bastard Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. Matthews like so many in the MSM, has sold his journalistic soul for 30 silver pieces. See Bill O'Reilly as well and many others.

Somebody tell me just what constitutes Plagiarizm?books are full of quotes from other books?

Dealey Joe wrote:Somebody tell me just what constitutes Plagiarizm?books are full of quotes from other books?This might help explain it Joe.http://www.plagiarism.org/