JFK RFK MLK Assassination Forum

j.j.c.bruinsma wrote:Bob wrote:Is Bugliosi kidding? Bugliosi say in a intervieuw he is in a deal with HBO to make a TV special/serie The JFK Assassination with Tom Hanks,what you know about that Bob,is Tom Hanks part of the SHIT..............?I always love the Tom Hanks films.gr.J.J.C.J.J.C, Hanks is in cahoots with it: http://www.ctka.net/playtone_3.html

kenmurray wrote:j.j.c.bruinsma wrote:Bob wrote:Is Bugliosi kidding? Bugliosi say in a intervieuw he is in a deal with HBO to make a TV special/serie The JFK Assassination with Tom Hanks,what you know about that Bob,is Tom Hanks part of the SHIT..............?I always love the Tom Hanks films.gr.J.J.C.J.J.C, Hanks is in cahoots with it: http://www.ctka.net/playtone_3.htmlHere's my politically correct answer. Is it possible that Hanks is being duped too and that they're only using him for his name to somehow give it legitemacy? Then again, when people participate in disinformation pieces, they're automatically suspect in my book.

More interesting stuff from Jim DiEugenio on Black Op Radio: http://odeo.com/episodes/24357692-Show- ... -DiEugenio http://odeo.com/episodes/24680995-Show- ... -DiEugenio

I now see that one David Von Pein is showing his support for Gary Mack on another forum. I mentioned again to Von Pein that he should go on Black Op Radio and debate DIEugenio. But in typical Lone Nut response, he did "paper debates" with DIEugenio instead. He said he didn't need to to go with conspiracy hungry kooks. My response was you dont have the guts to appear on the program, just avoid and call people "silly" and "kooks" What's he afraid of eh lol? Heck I'm sure DiEugenio wouldn't even mind if Von Pein got some coaching from his busom buddies Bugliosi and McAdams!

kenmurray wrote:I now see that one David Von Pein is showing his support for Gary Mack on another forum. I mentioned again to Von Pein that he should go on Black Op Radio and debate DIEugenio. But in typical Lone Nut response, he did "paper debates" with DIEugenio instead. He said he didn't need to to go with conspiracy hungry kooks. My response was you dont have the guts to appear on the program, just avoid and call people "silly" and "kooks" What's he afraid of eh lol? Heck I'm sure DiEugenio wouldn't even mind if Von Pein got some coaching from his busom buddies Bugliosi and McAdams! Aint that the truth!!!You forgot to add coaching from Mack-the-Sack/Larry DUNG-kel

Hey Paquale, this ridiculization is ok, cause Gary Mack deserves, that the public tells him what it really thinks, but does it reach the center of the problem? Why is it so difficult, once you have let pull yourself over the table by the money-media-trend-assimilation-machine, to row back and admit a mistake and going back to the original believe and truth? Chris

ChristophMessner wrote:Hey Paquale, this ridiculization is ok, cause Gary Mack deserves, that the public tells him what it really thinks, but does it reach the center of the problem? Why is it so difficult, once you have let pull yourself over the table by the money-media-trend-assimilation-machine, to row back and admit a mistake and going back to the original believe and truth? ChrisI don't think it's difficult at all for guys like Gary Mack/Larry Dunkel to admit a mistake. I just don't think he can without putting his job at risk. So, he deserves the spotlight on him as a disinformation person. He wishes we were making it up, but it's not true. We're just telling facts here. He has been exposed and will continue to be. That documentary that I saw him endorsing and participating in was a disgrace, and he knows it too.

Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:ChristophMessner wrote:Hey Paquale, this ridiculization is ok, cause Gary Mack deserves, that the public tells him what it really thinks, but does it reach the center of the problem? Why is it so difficult, once you have let pull yourself over the table by the money-media-trend-assimilation-machine, to row back and admit a mistake and going back to the original believe and truth? ChrisI don't think it's difficult at all for guys like Gary Mack/Larry Dunkel to admit a mistake. I just don't think he can without putting his job at risk. So, he deserves the spotlight on him as a disinformation person. He wishes we were making it up, but it's not true. We're just telling facts here. He has been exposed and will continue to be. That documentary that I saw him endorsing and participating in was a disgrace, and he knows it too.And we have Von Pein defending "Mack the knife" and endorsing that absurd "Inside the Target Car" documentary which reminds me of this hilarious show from Seinfeld: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEzBeP6pRoY

kenmurray wrote:Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:ChristophMessner wrote:Hey Paquale, this ridiculization is ok, cause Gary Mack deserves, that the public tells him what it really thinks, but does it reach the center of the problem? Why is it so difficult, once you have let pull yourself over the table by the money-media-trend-assimilation-machine, to row back and admit a mistake and going back to the original believe and truth? ChrisI don't think it's difficult at all for guys like Gary Mack/Larry Dunkel to admit a mistake. I just don't think he can without putting his job at risk. So, he deserves the spotlight on him as a disinformation person. He wishes we were making it up, but it's not true. We're just telling facts here. He has been exposed and will continue to be. That documentary that I saw him endorsing and participating in was a disgrace, and he knows it too.And we have Von Pein defending "Mack the knife" and endorsing that absurd "Inside the Target Car" documentary which reminds me of this hilarious show from Seinfeld: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEzBeP6pRoYSeinfeld relates to almost every situation in life. That was a CLASSIC show. JFK was the master of his own domain and MANY others. Why did JFK wear underwear? To keep his ankles warm.

If anyone wants to voice their opinion on the new Discovery Documentary about Oswald and Ruby coming in the future check this out: http://www.ctka.net/alerts.html