JFK RFK MLK Assassination Forum

Jim DiEugenio will appear again on Black Op Radio next week. Who knows, maybe Von Pein, McAdams, Reitzes, or Gary Mack will get a formal invitation for a debate with Jim.

I'm sure that Bugliosi is happy that the MSM is concentrating on the 40th anniversary of the Manson murders and his role in the prosecution of Charlie and the others. That way the MSM won't have to ask Vince about the embarrassing book sales he has on Reclaiming History and all the inaccurracies that are contained in the book.

Bob wrote:I'm sure that Bugliosi is happy that the MSM is concentrating on the 40th anniversary of the Manson murders and his role in the prosecution of Charlie and the others. That way the MSM won't have to ask Vince about the embarrassing book sales he has on Reclaiming History and all the inaccurracies that are contained in the book.Bob, I doubt the MSM will never ask Vince about his lousy book sales on that book. I can picture Vince on Hardball and Mathews kissing his ass on how great his book his.

In his book 'Reclaiming History" Bugliosi wants his readers to believe that Clay Shaw was some "card carrying" liberal lol. Really Vince? I guess the next thing Vince would want us to believe is that David Ferrie was one too. Oh wait a minute. In his whole book of garbage Vince donates about FOUR sentences to Ferrie and Oswald in the Civil Air Patrol. I therefore will provide more than FOUR sentences to Ferrie in this link:http://www.geocities.com/garrisoninvestigation/

kenmurray wrote:In his book 'Reclaiming History" Bugliosi wants his readers to believe that Clay Shaw was some "card carrying" liberal lol. Really Vince? I guess the next thing Vince would want us to believe is that David Ferrie was one too. Oh wait a minute. In his whole book of garbage Vince donates about FOUR sentences to Ferrie and Oswald in the Civil Air Patrol. I therefore will provide more than FOUR sentences to Ferrie in this link:http://www.geocities.com/garrisoninvestigation/Let's also not forget that Posner layed an egg on this one too...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M9ff6FK-CM

if you have seen aaron russo's interview, he was approached by the ptb to "join the club" because he was a mover and a shaker. (meaning that he was followed by the masses and respected for his work). it is obvious to me that bugliosi has been approached and has joined the club. at one point he was principled in his endeavors, now he has sold out. others have joined....look at Tom Hanks, he is obviously another one. it is important for them to recruit these guys for their PR work. they do not want you to "pay any attention to the man behind the curtain" (wizard of oz)what is pretty cool is the fact that it has been more than 45 years and they are still active in trying to persuade the public that there was no conspiracy. the reason is that this event is the cornerstone in their whole existence and if it falls, then the masses will see the world for what it is. everyone reading this should go to paypal and send this website $10, $20, $100 or whatever you can afford to help support this free knowledge that Wim has paid for over the years. Wim, could you post how someone could send you a donation through paypal? I intend to contribute.Namaste'

I recognize the writer's name from somewhere that I can't recall ..I think this article is a tiring re-run or rehash from previous articles.It's disgusting and disturbing how the image of Jackie Kennedy is used and exploited in this most recent lame bit of journalism ...There's a comment board attached. http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/ ... think.html

Sutch guy,s as Bugliosi,he looks like a strange kind of mixture between robert dufall , henry fonda,in their extremely day,s and with some fantasy i even recognice some features of edgar allan poe.Man you should have seen them kicking edgar allan poe,,,good thing JohnThese resemblances allong with his backstreets of napels background makes a disastrous combination.For that case and protection against sutch nasty persons it,s very wise and clever i think that serious conspiracy believers should not attack each other and be even more determent to find what really did happen.

Pennyworth wrote:I recognize the writer's name from somewhere that I can't recall ..I think this article is a tiring re-run or rehash from previous articles.It's disgusting and disturbing how the image of Jackie Kennedy is used and exploited in this most recent lame bit of journalism ...There's a comment board attached. http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/ ... nk.htmlJFK SAID to 'leave Castro and his government alone.'JFK and Castro met to talk and it looked like they were friends Castro accused David Rockefeller of many things ..article coming up if I can retrieve itI wish some of the stuff that we have logged here would make google news. I wonder why not.

Here's one article (not the same one I previously saw) but has basically the same contents:"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/brainwas ... ontrol.htm