JFK RFK MLK Assassination Forum

Phil, my copy of Vol 5 was shipped today. Looking forward to it.

i am getting 4 and 5.I'm not so sure, i was told Horne and JimD are anti Judyth?

Joe, I don't think that it's so much that Jim D. is anti-Judyth. He doesn't see her story as being that important. Unlike Lifton and Jack White who seems to try their best to discredit her. Horne, I dont know yet.

I can understand that but I think any living witness deserves to be looked at with respect.I think the more you can know about a player is important.All the Harvey and Lee crap is getting attention.Just like files, I guess they think he is noy important either.I don't knbow if Ed got a fair shake?

I'm not dismissive of anybody named herein. I think we are verging on a unified matrix.I find Jimmy Files very credible, did from the first.I think Ed Hoffman is additive, not dispositive. And that goes to Jimmy Files claiming exclusivity in order to protect someone still living--because he is all about loyalty.I believe Judyth Vary Baker ties Ferrie and the whole cancer-as-weapon concept together--because I take Jack Ruby at his literal meaning: they were injecting him with the cancer that killed him.I don't think Horne is dismissive of anybody in IV as I turn to final.Jim is the historian, the sourcer, and isn't apt to get very enthusiastic about anybody or anything--I sense that he's been fighting the good fight for decades and goes up the hill footnote by interview transcript by declassified document--nothing quick.You guys are very street-smart. There's balance and a deep bench--and the Posnerians (although financed with millions in black funds) can't get the dogs to eat their chow.Remember Angleton asking the Bay of Pigs planners if they'd left themselves an escape hatch.The magic bullet crowd can't sell it.And have you seen Gil Jesus' Ten Challenges for WarrComm? Killer stuff.http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboar ... 7071&page=

Phil, I will be waiting for the Lone Nut crowd especially Von Pein to come up with answers and not excuses for Gil's 10 challenges.

My Vol 5 came in the mail today. Looks quite interesting so far.

Volume 2 Of Inside The AARB reviewed by Jim DiEugenio:http://www.ctka.net/reviews/horne_jd_2.html

KenMy Volume II arrived and I'm finishing Volume III. "The Slippery J.J. Humes"I reviewed Volume IV on Amazon; it made the cut--and Doug Horne thanked me for being "informed."I reviewed Volume V, but don't know if it made Amazon's cut. I was under their 300-word limit, but I don't know if they have other criteria not shown. I don't know why Lifton is such an obsession with people.Horne's interviews established Humes wielded a skull saw in the 6:45-7:15 preautopsy.And an "incision" over the right eyebrow at the hairline removed an entry wound.And, in III, Humes plays the Dance of Seven Veils with the "fragment with bevelling"--too bad Humes died without being staked out on top of the Washington Memorial.

Dear Mr. Phil Dragoo, and Fellow JFK Forum Members:Phil - Your usual par-excellance. When you have finished the entire set of works, I would welcome your overall critique, please. And I won't limit you to 300 words.In the meantime, taking your advice, I intend to read the entire set. Thank You.I am particularly interested in your most recent Post, and focused upon your specific words:"And an 'incision' over the right eyebrow at the hairline removed an entry wound."James Earl Sutton/Files made three outstanding revelations in his 1993 and 2003 interviews, my words, condensed versions:1. As Jimmy looked through the scope and pulled the trigger, he saw JFK lean forward from Nicoletti's shot, causing Jimmy to miss his exact shot.2. This caused Jimmy's shot for which he was aiming at JFK'S right eye, which was to Jimmy's left facing JFK, to hit right at the right eyebrow area.3. While Jimmy was looking at JFK and the quick aftermath, he claimed the JKF limo slowed considerably before speeding up.All three (3) of these points were made in the 1993 live interview, and to me and a few others, years earlier. These three (3) points were scoffed at and called outright fabrications or imagined. Now that the close-ups of JFK being shot in the head have been studied very closely, including the slowing of the limo, all three (3) points have been verified in several research studies on this subject matter, and referenced numerous times on the JFK Forum.Jimmy Sutton/Files - 3 vs. Detractors - 0.Comments ?Respectfully,Bruce Patrick Brychek.