JFK RFK MLK Assassination Forum

Pennyworth wrote:altered back bullet hole does not match up with conclusions ...http://meltdown2011.com/2008/02/23/prez ... rren-rpt/I previously posted a 'magic bullet theory diagram' but cannot find it here on this board... but here's another one...quite lame...this one shows no head shot http://www.nachtkabarett.com/ihvh/img/n ... bullet.jpg

Pennyworth wrote:Pennyworth wrote:OK,In response to someone's inquiry,There's over 60,000 articles to pour through to find the statement I once saw and remembered about someone telling Jackie Kennedy 'not to mention the front shot.'I will keep plugging on as I am curious also now.In the mean time I found this:When you look at the amount of eyewitness testimony regarding the right rear head wound, they all concur this part of Kennedy’s head was blasted out. even the violent backwards thrust of Kennedy’s body against the back seat testifies to a frontal assault and entrance wound. Jackie Kennedy said jack looked normal from the front, but she had trouble holding his head together. we now know why she made that statement.http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com ... iracy.html I AM GETTING CLOSE From the above paragraph :"Jackie Kennedy said Jack looked normal from the front, but she had trouble holding his head together"Now she sort of twists the statement around for the Warren Commission:" I was trying to hold his hair on. From the front there was nothing --- I suppose there must have been. But from the back you could see, you know, you were trying to hold his hair on, and his skull on."http://www.jfklancer.com/LNE/jbkwc.htmlPP: This is the first article I came across with the Warren Commission on Jackie Kennedy'stestimony.please ignore the fact that it came from the Lancer. i feel the same way that Wim does about them A MOST CREDIBLE AND INCREDIBLE WITNESS: Jackie Kennedy stated in a statement: " I was trying to hold his hair on. From the front there was nothing --- I suppose there must have been. But from the back you could see, you know, you were trying to hold his hair on, and his skull on."http://www.jfklancer.com/LNE/jbkwc.htmlSubstitute 'suppose' for the word 'believe ' and the word 'must' for 'for certain' and 'nothing' for 'no quantity or magnitude' according to dictionary definitions and we can read her statement this way ; " I was trying to hold his hair on. From the front there was no quantity or magnitude --- I believe there for certain had been. But from the back you could see, you know, you were trying to hold his hair on, and his skull on."

Hello,I see that the above post is being overlooked. It shouldn't be.Can I get some feedback from anyone? How about you Wim?

Pennyworth wrote:Pennyworth wrote:altered back bullet hole does not match up with conclusions ...http://meltdown2011.com/2008/02/23/prez ... rren-rpt/I previously posted a 'magic bullet theory diagram' but cannot find it here on this board... but here's another one...quite lame...this one shows no head shot http://www.nachtkabarett.com/ihvh/img/n ... bullet.jpg I found it! http://www.jfk-assassination.de/media/d ... /magic.phpsame one

Letters of sympathy and empathy to Jacqueline Kennedy http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news ... 5_VA_N.htm

tom jeffers wrote:there was glass partitions between the conneleys and the drivers. they are split in the middle and were photographed at the hospital if you look closely. look at the slow motion of the z film and watch only the conneleys and you can see them hit the windows and then their heads go down.i saw it too