Page 4 of 4

Re: 9.11.2001

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 2:14 am
by kenmurray
Dean Hartwell On The Real Deal With Jim Fetzer:http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2012/03 ... twell.html

Re: 9.11.2001

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:36 pm
by kenmurray
The Fabrication Of The 9/11 Crash Sites:http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2012/04/jim-viken.html

Re: 9.11.2001

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:15 am
by kenmurray
Where the 9/11 passengers went after landing in Cleveland:http://deanhartwell.weebly.com/1/post/2 ... eland.html

Re: 9.11.2001

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 3:15 am
by kenmurray

Re: 9.11.2001

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 2:13 pm
by Tom Bigg
I'll buy the mini-nuke theory as there seems to be enough scientific substantiation to back that up; but the version I would accept is that the TTs were actually hit by the planes as well as the Pentagon, then the nukes that were at the bases of the TT buildings and #6 in cases of emergencies like this were triggered to minimize collateral damage. It is just too fantastic to believe that the planes landed elsewhere, etc.. Life is fraught with accidents and unplanned disasters, not everything is a product of evil people conspiring to do illegal, immoral and highly lucrative things. The illuminati have unlimited contempt for the rabble. "Jerry Springer" and "Maury Povich"--that is their perception of the character of the vast majority of the citizenry.