Page 35 of 44
Re: NEW WORLD ORDER....
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:22 pm
by ChristophMessner
The main problem is that a world central authority which should guarantee human rights could controll these rights only by having the strongest executive power and this is always in danger to misuse this power in the interest of the power groups which would cycle around this centrum. The truth is: there is no center on the globe and life developes out of the tension between poles.
Re: NEW WORLD ORDER....
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:35 pm
by Pennyworth
Re: NEW WORLD ORDER....
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:57 pm
by Bob
Here's one of the conspirators in the murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy talking about his vision of the New World Order...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCF ... relatedOne day...the world will find REAL order again and evil cowards like the Bu$h family will be exposed for the traitors and murderers that they are.
Re: NEW WORLD ORDER....
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:18 pm
by kenmurray
Bob wrote:Here's one of the conspirators in the murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy talking about his vision of the New World Order...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCF ... relatedOne day...the world will find REAL order again and evil cowards like the Bu$h family will be exposed for the traitors and murderers that they are. Yes Bob and Poppy's golf buddy agreeing with him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzUkhKaN ... re=related
Re: NEW WORLD ORDER....
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:45 pm
by Bob
kenmurray wrote:Bob wrote:Here's one of the conspirators in the murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy talking about his vision of the New World Order...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCF ... relatedOne day...the world will find REAL order again and evil cowards like the Bu$h family will be exposed for the traitors and murderers that they are. Yes Bob and Poppy's golf buddy agreeing with him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzUkhKaN ... relatedYes indeed Ken...too many people have never put together Mena and the Bu$h/Clinton connection. The MSM has helped to bury that as well.
Re: NEW WORLD ORDER....
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:47 pm
by Pennyworth
As Bob said; 'Follow the money"..Macedo's TV station in Brazil....
http://cbrayton.wordpress.com/2007/09/2 ... 227678.jpg
Re: NEW WORLD ORDER....
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 10:02 pm
by Pennyworth
Re: NEW WORLD ORDER....
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:36 am
by Bob
Re: NEW WORLD ORDER....
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 4:22 pm
by Pennyworth
BREAKING MEXICO'S BACK
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=1528These outcomes should not have come as a surprise. Nafta does give Mexico a slight advantage over other trading partners. But with its low tax base, low investment in education and technology, and high inequality, Mexico would have a hard time competing with a dynamic China. Nafta enhanced Mexico's ability to supply American manufacturing firms with low-cost parts, but it did not make Mexico into an independently productive economy. When President Bill Clinton first asked the Council of Economic Advisers about the economic importance of Nafta, early in his administration, our response was that potential geopolitical benefits were far more important than the economic benefits. (Similarly, the European Union, for all of the economic benefits that it has brought, is mainly a political project.)
http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/c ... 27934.html
BREAKING AMERICA'S BACK...
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:30 pm
by Pennyworth
EffectsNAFTA's effects, both positive and negative, have been quantified by several economists, whose findings have been reported in publications such as the World Bank's Lessons from NAFTA for Latina America and the Caribbean,[7] NAFTA's Impact on North America,[8] and NAFTA Revisited by the Institute for International Economics.[9] Some argue that NAFTA has been positive for Mexico, which has seen its poverty rates fall and real income rise (in the form of lower prices, especially food), even after accounting for the 1994–1995 economic crisis.[10] Others argue that NAFTA has been beneficial to business owners and elites in all three countries, but has had negative impacts on farmers in Mexico who saw food prices fall based on cheap imports from U.S. agribusiness, and negative impacts on U.S. workers in manufacturing and assembly industries who lost jobs. Critics also argue that NAFTA has contributed to the rising levels of inequality in both the U.S. and Mexico. Some economists believe that NAFTA has not been enough (or worked fast enough) to produce an economic convergence,[11] nor to substantially reduce poverty rates. Some have suggested that in order to fully benefit from the agreement, Mexico must invest more in education and promote innovation in infrastructure and agriculture.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Amer ... _Agreement