Page 5 of 5
Re: How to convince a non-believer
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:29 pm
by Bob
ThomZajac wrote:Bob wrote-"I'm not the great Oz..."Well, I am glad that mystery has been solved- so much for thinking Bob was the 'easy' button.I will see if I can find the missile receipt stuff-Speaking of Oz...sometimes people think this of me ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOKK8mAkiUIDepending on the question, sometimes I am the easy button, especially regarding certain sports and teams. My JFK knowledge is pretty good, but I'm always anxoius to learn more. That's why I LOVE this forum.
Re: How to convince a non-believer
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:41 pm
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
Brian White wrote:Katisha- all you have to do is ask someone to read James Files' confessionand review the rest of this website- if that doesn't convince them, forget it.None are so blind as they who won't see-write them off as being sufferersof craniorectal fusion syndrome-meaning,their head is up their ass!Brian. Craniorectal, eh? LOL That's too good. What really bugs me is the people who know better and who are actively trying to disinform people, like McAdams (aka Mr. Nolan, right?), Gary Mack-the-Sack (aka Larry Dunkel), Gerald "The Poser" Posner, and Dale "Similation" Myers. Isn't it interesting that Mack (Dunkel) and McAdams (Nolan) have aliases? What's up with that?
Re: How to convince a non-believer
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:17 pm
by ThomZajac
This is from Spartacus..."James W. Sibert and Francis X. O'Neill, FD 302 report (22nd November, 1963)During the latter stages of this autopsy, Dr. Humes located an opening which appeared to be a bullet hole which was below the shoulders and two inches to the right of the middle line of the spinal column.This opening was probed by Dr. Humes with the finger, at which time it was determined that the trajectory of the missile entering at this point had entered at a downward position of 45 to 60 degrees. Further probing determined that the distance traveled by this missile was a short distance inasmuch as the end of the opening could be felt with the finger.Inasmuch as no complete bullet of any size could be located in the brain area and likewise no bullet could be located in the back or any other area of the body as determined by total body X-Rays and inspection revealing there was no point of exit, the individuals performing the autopsy were at a loss to explain why they could find no bullets.A call was made by Bureau agents to the Firearms Section of the FBI Laboratory, at which time SA Charles L. Killion advised that the Laboratory had received through Secret Service Agent Richard Johnson a bullet which had reportedly been found on a stretcher in the emergency room of Parkland Hospital, Dallas, Texas. This stretcher had also contained a stethoscope and pair of rubber gloves. Agent Johnson had advised the Laboratory that it had not been ascertained whether or not this was the stretcher which had been used to transport the body of President Kennedy. Agent Killion further described this bullet as pertaining to a 6.5 millimeter rifle which would be approximately a 25 caliber rifle and that this bullet consisted of a copper alloy full jacket.Immediately following receipt of this information, this was made available to Dr. Humes who advised that in his opinion this accounted for no bullet being located which had entered the back region and that since external cardiac massage had been performed at Parkland Hospital, it was entirely possible that through such movement the bullet had worked its way back out of the point of entry and had fallen on the stretcher." (2) William Matson Law, In the Eye of History (2005)O'Neill went on to say there was no cutting of the body of the president until the X-rays were developed. "Humes pointed out to Sibert and I the many fragments of bullets and skull that was in the skull cavity." He does not mention seeing the sliver of what appears to be a bullet in the right part of the skull, which is quite obvious in the frontal X-ray (photo 7) and should have been mentioned in the 302 report that Sibert and O'Neill made from their notes-nor does O'Neill remember seeing this metal fragment when the ARRB showed him the Kennedy AP X-ray during his testimony in 1997, indicating, I believe, that the X-rays now in the archives are indeed composites, as suggested by Dr. David Mantik. Mantik has run tests on the X-rays and believes they are composites, i.e., forgeries. I believe O'Neill holds part of the key to this and gives confirmation to Mantik's suspicions, even though, because of his nature and background as a government agent and later State Congressman, he is incapable of believing that John E Kennedy was killed as a result of a government conspiracy. Plainly he has not studied the case in all aspects, e.g., the Dallas witnesses to the assassination, the paper trail of documents, the actions and inaction of the Secret Service in the days leading up to and including the aftermath of the assassination, and, of course, what happened at the Bethesda morgue. He holds keys he does not know he possesses, keys locked in memory.The most stunning portion of the manuscript on Kennedy that O'Neill sent me was yet to come: "Humes pointed the many fragments of bullets or skull that was in the skull cavity. Parts of the brain were still within the cavity, but not much." (emphasis mine) This fits directly with Paul O'Connor's recollection that when President Kennedy was taken from the casket and the sheets were unwrapped from around the head, there was no brain to be removed; only fragments were left inside the cranium...O'Neill says in his unpublished work that no cutting was done on the body until the X-rays were developed. "The X-rays were returned to a small room within the autopsy room and viewed." O'Neill goes on to say the head wound was "massive": "Humes pointed out to Sibert and myself the gaping wound at the right rear of the president's head and the tremendous damage done to the brain therein." He goes on to explain that Humes had started the autopsy by doing the Y-incision on the chest - "of course, after he dictated the normal procedural information relative to his observations in relation to the body." O'Neill then says that "Pierre Ruck from the crimes institute [Armed Forces Institute of Pathology] arrived at that time to help with the procedure." Humes then "indicated the bullet had fragmented upon hitting the skull" and removed two fragments of metal. "He measured one and told Sibert and me it was 7 by 2 millimeters. The other one was measured 1 by 3 millimeters." They placed the fragments in a glass jar. The agents then signed a receipt "for both missiles." O'Neill then claims that he and Sibert helped turn Kennedy's body over. "The first thing that everyone noticed was the large scar on the president's back due to an operative procedure."I'm still looking for more on this- I remember seeing a copy of the receipt long, long ago.....
Re: How to convince a non-believer
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:53 am
by ThomZajac
Katisha, here's a good link ( I just can't give up on getting he curl out of the pig's tail)-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4PcJLdi ... annel_page
Re: How to convince a non-believer
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:06 am
by Bob
Thom...I picture you standing behind a curtain...pulling levers and talking. You are...the GREAT Oz! You also are a persistent investigator! Good work!
Re: How to convince a non-believer
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:29 am
by kenmurray
ThomZajac wrote:Katisha, here's a good link ( I just can't give up on getting he curl out of the pig's tail)-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4PcJLdi ... _pageGreat video Thom. The lone nut crowd has no problem with this either
Re: How to convince a non-believer
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:51 am
by ThomZajac
The MIGHTY OZ SAYS-Massive exit wound in the back of JFK's head- irrefutable, is it not?Thanks for the kind words- there's a lot of good work being done here. Bob, thanks for the youtube links! Mark Lane's witness series on where the shots came from is EXTRAORDINARY! I've seen them before, but they blow me away every time. A must see, Katisha!
Re: How to convince a non-believer
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:52 am
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
ThomZajac wrote:Katisha, here's a good link ( I just can't give up on getting he curl out of the pig's tail)-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4PcJLdi ... eThom,That is a GREAT link. I didn't know that the Bethesda doctors said the same thing about the back of JFK's head. Very good link!
Re: How to convince a non-believer
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:32 am
by katisha
Damn it, I think too much. Been pondering on what I think the bullet wounds really were:Kennedy's back wound - from behind (see my last post - either that or it fell out somewhere else and no-one noticed).Connally's armpit/ribs/nipple wound - from behind. Those two I'm quite sure of; and sure that they WERE two, not one.Connally's wrist and thigh wounds? Dunno.Kennedy's fatal head wound - from front right.The one that's exercising me tiny mind at the moment is Kennedy's throat wound. It came from the front, for my money (all $2.63 of it ).Where did it go?Any thoughts, theories, ideas?btw, Brian, I love "craniorectal fusion syndrome". Sounds exactly like the kind of bureaucratic BS I listen to in meetings every day