Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
Bob, you got that right! Black Op Radio is a good forum with some good guests and Len seems to be a great host.
Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
Mack "the sack" won't debate any of today's researchers today like Wim, Groden, Marrs, or Rossely. He would get embarassed and taken to the cleaners
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
have you read that debate between wim and gary hack? it's on wims site i was laughing my butt off at gary hack wim epically and totally pwn'ed gary big time.
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
very well said pasquale it is official i'm definately not going back to the lancer forum thank you pasquale for posting this.
Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
I certainly don't agree with a lot of Kathy's assertions, but it's good that we can have this debate. I think it makes the opinions and knowledge of this forum overall that much stronger. We don't want this forum to be exclusionary, like it is at the 6th Floor Museum at the TSBD or on the Discovery channel's JFK assassination specials. When there is no debate or when one speaks in front of a well screened and a pro-agenda audience like Dumbya Bu$h did in his Presidential speeches, then the argument becomes MUCH weaker.
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
Bob wrote:I certainly don't agree with a lot of Kathy's assertions, but it's good that we can have this debate. I think it makes the opinions and knowledge of this forum overall that much stronger. We don't want this forum to be exclusionary, like it is at the 6th Floor Museum at the TSBD or on the Discovery channel's JFK assassination specials. When there is no debate or when one speaks in front of a well screened and a pro-agenda audience like Dumbya Bu$h did in his Presidential speeches, then the argument becomes MUCH weaker.Exactly, Bob. As much as it might look like it, I'm not attacking Kathy Becket personally. Her assertions do look like straw-man arguments to me, and so I asked her if that is because she's being misled or not. I looked at the Lancer forum, and she is a member there. It's not outside the realm of possibility that she is being misled over there about the Files information. Didn't Wim have a problem at Lancer too?
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
saracarter766 wrote:very well said pasquale it is official i'm definately not going back to the lancer forum thank you pasquale for posting this. I don't blame you at all, Sara, and thanks for the compliment. Well, if you DO go back to the Lancer forum just to take a peek, just give 'em a nice big cup of you-know-what when they start misrepresenting the Files information. LOLThat seems to be what these Files critics like to do. They tend to always say that we're just believe him because he said so. Yeah, right! LOL
Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
Pasquale and Bob, great posts here. It is for sure straw man arguments from kathy and it does sound familiar from other forums. It's like a slap in the face to think we here in this forum are being misled by Groden and Marrs and we are incapable of thinking for ourselves. I would say that all of us here know what a sellout is and that for sure is Gary Mack!
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
cough gary idot hack is a fraud cough.and i don't mean to be crude here but gary hack can kiss my ass. gary hacks brain is the size of a peanut hahaha.
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"
saracarter766 wrote:cough gary idot hack is a fraud cough.and i don't mean to be crude here but gary hack can kiss my ass. gary hacks brain is the size of a peanut hahaha. And now he's unofficial known as Mack the Sack too!!! LOL