Page 1 of 1
Blueprint of a Conspiracy
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:16 am
by ThomZajac
Below is a link to an excellent video regarding TWA Flight 800 and the government's 'investigation' into the cause of its demise. I think it provides us with a bone-chilling understanding of how the government goes about covering up the truth, and hence, the video provides us also with a better understanding of the government's investigation into the assassination of JFK.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6BUXu0AEpg(part one of six)
Re: Blueprint of a Conspiracy
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:20 am
by ThomZajac
I thought this was really good, but no one has responded. Interesting.
Re: Blueprint of a Conspiracy
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:32 am
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
ThomZajac wrote:I thought this was really good, but no one has responded. Interesting.I'll respond! LOLIt's EXACTLY what they did in the Warren Commission. They ignored any evidence other than the evidence that supported what they wanted the conclusion to be. Could that plane been taken down by a shoulder-operated surface to air missile...like a Stinger missile? I know they're small, but was the plane low enough or within target range of such a weapon?
Re: Blueprint of a Conspiracy
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:38 am
by ThomZajac
Not likely a stinger. More likely a military exercise gone horribly array. I think it was Pierre Salinger who claimed to have an admission from a submarine caption that he had fired the missile which brought down TWA flight 800, which, by the way, was flying far lower than usual due to its late departure and incoming traffic.Thanks for the response, Pasquale. It was the nature of the investigation that I found particularly relevant. The comparisons to the Warren Commission are many and frightening.
Re: Blueprint of a Conspiracy
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:18 am
by Bob
Thom, sometimes posts go on the wayside, no matter how relevant they are. Trust me...I've been there...done that. But your subject matter is very interesting. These so called "investigations" or "commissions" are a farce, whether it's about Flight 800, the Warren Commission or 9/11. It's like going to a play where you know the ending before hand. The sheeple don't know, but the people in power do.
Re: Blueprint of a Conspiracy
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:14 am
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
Bob wrote:Thom, sometimes posts go on the wayside, no matter how relevant they are. Trust me...I've been there...done that. But your subject matter is very interesting. These so called "investigations" or "commissions" are a farce, whether it's about Flight 800, the Warren Commission or 9/11. It's like going to a play where you know the ending before hand. The sheeple don't know, but the people in power do.Exactly. Instead of the word "commission" maybe they should just use "omission" instead!You know...The 9/11 Omission, The Warren Omission, etc.
Re: Blueprint of a Conspiracy
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:41 am
by ThomZajac
It' very telling that they can get away these shams, and so easily. I bet most people, knowing little, believe the government's tale of TWA Flight 800.
Re: Blueprint of a Conspiracy
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:24 pm
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
ThomZajac wrote:It' very telling that they can get away these shams, and so easily. I bet most people, knowing little, believe the government's tale of TWA Flight 800.Of course they get away with it. They control the media. Most people I talk to, and I mean MOST people I talk to, don't even know that World Trade Center Building 7 came straight down hours later in the same way.The 9/11 "Omission" report doesn't even talk about WTC 7. WTF? The key lies in the fact that most people just flat-out believe what they are told by the media and government. I would venture to say that they believe the media MORE than they believe the government, but if the government controlls the media too...go figure.If we had an actual free press in this country and in the world, things would be a LOT different. These people are using taxpayer money to line their pockets. Taxpayer money pays for Iraq, pays the salaries of these people. Besides the various commissions, look at authors like Gerald Posner. His book, Case Closed, is proven disinformation, even mathematically and statistically. (That just means that statistically he could not have made the factual errors he made in his book by chance. It's statistically no likely at all.) Anyway, Gerald Posner can put out his garbage, and it gets validation from a major news anchor on MSNBC, Chris Mathews. That's all it takes. The rest of us here don't give Posner's book any more credit just because Chris Matthews said it's good. We know better than that, BUT the public is more easily duped. This is really beginning to piss me off in a big way. The smug way in which they lie and then put it out as fact is really, really bugging me a lot.
Re: Blueprint of a Conspiracy
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:29 pm
by Bob
Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:ThomZajac wrote:It' very telling that they can get away these shams, and so easily. I bet most people, knowing little, believe the government's tale of TWA Flight 800.Of course they get away with it. They control the media. Most people I talk to, and I mean MOST people I talk to, don't even know that World Trade Center Building 7 came straight down hours later in the same way.The 9/11 "Omission" report doesn't even talk about WTC 7. WTF? The key lies in the fact that most people just flat-out believe what they are told by the media and government. I would venture to say that they believe the media MORE than they believe the government, but if the government controlls the media too...go figure.If we had an actual free press in this country and in the world, things would be a LOT different. These people are using taxpayer money to line their pockets. Taxpayer money pays for Iraq, pays the salaries of these people. Besides the various commissions, look at authors like Gerald Posner. His book, Case Closed, is proven disinformation, even mathematically and statistically. (That just means that statistically he could not have made the factual errors he made in his book by chance. It's statistically no likely at all.) Anyway, Gerald Posner can put out his garbage, and it gets validation from a major news anchor on MSNBC, Chris Mathews. That's all it takes. The rest of us here don't give Posner's book any more credit just because Chris Matthews said it's good. We know better than that, BUT the public is more easily duped. This is really beginning to piss me off in a big way. The smug way in which they lie and then put it out as fact is really, really bugging me a lot.Nice rant there Pasquale! You just saved me from saying the same thing. Bottom line, just look at Family of Secrets by Russ Baker. I know from talking to Russ that he has tried to get on Keith Olbermann's show, Rachel Maddow's show, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Bill Maher's show on HBO, but nobody except those like Alex Jones and Air America are giving him a sniff. Why? Too much truth.
Re: Blueprint of a Conspiracy
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:39 pm
by Pasquale DiFabrizio
Bob, that means that they are controlled too. There's no other reasonable explanation why they won't give him the time of day. What a bunch of posers they are. Seriously. They're not about the truth, at least not in the abstract way they're not.