Page 1 of 2
Hugh Aynesworth on Buel Frazier
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:55 pm
by Dealey Joe
Re: Hugh Aynesworth on Buel Frazier
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:01 pm
by Bob
Joe...I don't believe ANYTHING written by Aynesworth. Dave Perry manages Aynesworth web site. That's ALL you need to know. Disinformation is thy name!
Re: Hugh Aynesworth on Buel Frazier
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:26 pm
by Bob
Re: Hugh Aynesworth on Buel Frazier
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 12:51 am
by Dealey Joe
I do not know Aynesworth but when I saw he was a DMN reporter I assumed he was for sale.My question was what about Frazier?but i imagine this subject has been covered inside and out.
Re: Hugh Aynesworth on Buel Frazier
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 1:47 am
by tom jeffers
i think frazier was truthful and i do not believe oswald carried any weopons that day.
Re: Hugh Aynesworth on Buel Frazier
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 2:12 am
by Dealey Joe
I get a feeling he was but he seemed to be connected to the Paines in somewayand I think they are dirty. I wonder if he was a patsy like Oswald
Re: Hugh Aynesworth on Buel Frazier
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 2:17 am
by Dealey Joe
I think he would have only been around 18 years oldjust a kid. he looked older though.
Re: Hugh Aynesworth on Buel Frazier
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 3:41 am
by kenmurray
I find Frazier a little suspicious especially if he a "close friend" of Dave Perry as Perry claims they are.
Re: Hugh Aynesworth on Buel Frazier
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:15 am
by Phil Dragoo
Bob, here's the money quote from your Aynesworth link:With the work of the Assassination Records Review Board, many more pages of documents have been released showing how tightly bound Aynesworth was with the intelligence community. It has been demonstrated that Aynesworth was -- at the minimum -- working with the Dallas Police, Shaw's defense team, and the FBI. He was also an informant to the White House, and had once applied for work with the CIA. As I have noted elsewhere, in the annals of this case, I can think of no "reporter" who had such extensive contacts with those trying to cover up the facts in the JFK case. And only two come close: Edward Epstein and Gerald Posner.The newspaper article doesn't mention which of the five bags Oswald used that day.Nobody at work saw him carry anything inside.I think the only palm print found was that of Clay Shaw on Aynesworth's six.Jim DiEugenio's article in The Assassinations is clear the degree to which the highest levels of the FBI and CIA sabotaged Garrison.The FBI investigated hundreds of potential witnesses; the CIA put a Teletype in its NO office to advise Langley where Helms asked at every morning muster, "How are our people in New Orleans?"And Dave Perry? That's his hand up Gary Mack, his voice when Mack moves his lips.
Re: Hugh Aynesworth on Buel Frazier
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 5:03 am
by SeamusCoogan
Dealey Joe wrote:Where do you think Wes Frazier fits into the picture?
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent ... 89.htmlHey Joe check out my mate by the name of Greg Parker. He's probably done the most in depth studies of Buell Frazier thus far, Joe. He gets a brief stint here. But its the 2nd link thats more to the point.
http://www.ctka.net/2008/bugliosi_6_review.htmlBut its on the ed forums and his own site where you will find out more stuff. Email him tell him I sent you lol and he'll be all keen to help. In fact I really should post more of his stuff on here he's very good very thorough. This is a real goody Joe.
http://reopenkennedycase.forumotion.net ... -t24.htmHe has some really cool other topics as well Joe. Hes also got a great sense of humour.
http://reopenkennedycase.forumotion.net/jfk-f1/In fact what will concern you with Frazier will be Ian Griggs and his work on the brown paper bag thats where the questions of Frazier also comes into it. This is a great piece called The Paper Bag That Never Was. You should enquire about getting a copy of No Case to Answer and keep an eye out on Griggs latest book, his physical evidence work is immaculate and if you wanna know about the structure of the DPD his book is a must. Im a tough barstad with literature Joe and I give No Case to Answer a good 7 outta ten Griggs miscalculated with his piece on Prouty (as have a lot of people however).
http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.ba ... pbag1.html