JFK RFK MLK Assassination Forum

I was just throwing this out there. I'm not saying I agree with it. The one thing that I do find interesting is the positioning of Lovelady's hands in the doorway and compare to photos of Oswald doing the same thing.

Dear Messrs. Ken Murray and Joe Hall:Gentlemen - Excellent contributions by both of you outstanding JFK Murder Solved Forum Moderators, and JFK Researchers. In addition, you both have made, and continue to make, substantial contributions on many other related and unrelated significant subject matters. It is easy to see why you both are so well respected, as you both keep unearthing and presenting outstanding material for the less gifted like myself to study and analyze from all points of view. And I learn something from everything that I read, just like I will from both of your suggested readings. Thank You both.The information presented by both of you, I have never seen before. And like all information such as this, none of us most likely believes all of everything anymore. But each piece of research often contains at least 1 - 2 vital clues. My great grandfather's watch is broken for many years now, but it is still right twice a day.I will more carefully review all of this material this weekend.Thank You both for your professional dedication as I learn much from both of you.Respectfully,BB.

I understand Ken and I think there ire two sides to this story, However when I first looked closely at the picture I asked Judyth Vary Baker and Dr. Fetzer, both supposedly experts on Oswald if in fact could that be Oswald in the doorway?I felt there was some similarities.They both adamantly assured me that in no way could that be Oswald, In fact it was actually Lovelady and the picture had been photo shopped or manipulated?asfter looking at the available pictures of Lovelady and Oswald I too have come to the conclusion that it is fact Lovelady.There are other pictures of him standing in the crowd around the door after the shots were fired.

Joe. if you check the recent articles done by Fetzer in Veterans today, he now believes it was Oswald at the doorway and not Lovelady.

Yes I know he has teamed up with Ralph Cinque. I just dont see it being Oswald

Dear Messrs. Ken Murray, and Joe Hall:Gentlemen - Excellent material and points of interest about a subject matter that obviously can be of very critical importance and interest, with a variety of points of view. And this will definitely be open to healthy debate and speculation, with the possibility of additional information being made available.Why don't each of you academically take either side of the argument, and TOGETHER, Post pictures, and allow JFK Murder Solved Forum Members to cast their votes, either Pro or Con ?I for one would be very interested in seeing how the voting pattern falls.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

I thought we had already posted both sides of the issue?I'm not sure which side Ken is on if any?To me what is more important is Why after 50 years of denial are they making a different claim, must be something in it for them?To me it just is not Oswald.What say Ken?

Here's what we do know (or at least what I believe). The CIA was totally involved in the JFK assassination. In fact, LHO was a CIA operative, as well as a FBI informant. We know there were a number of LHO look-alikes in Dallas. Billy Lovelady is one of them. Secondly, we also know that the CIA was also involved in the RFK assassination. Our friend Michael Calder has developed a great theory that places two people that look exactly alike in the pantry of the Ambassador Hotel. One was Sirhan, and one was the real killer, who shot RFK point blank in the back of the head, while Sirhan was firing from the front. Put these two events together. CIA involvement. Look-alikes. "Lone nut" shooters...at least according to the authorities and the MSM. Almost 50 years later, nothing has officially changed.What does that tell you about the power of the CIA? And the spinelessness of the MSM.