Re: He's a mystery, wrapped in a riddle, inside an enigma
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:47 pm
Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote: what will NEW laws accomplish? ... I just don't think that new laws would work. Maybe instead of new laws, we need new law enforcement and judicial officials. Maybe their records should be reviewed PUBLICLY and their jobs voted on by the public. Now THAT would put someone's underwear in a knot, wouldn't it? Can you imagine if a judge or cop could be fired from their job by the PEOPLE through a voting system that came around every year? Their records reviewed by the public and then their employment fate voted on just like we vote for elections? Hmmmmm.....Maybe I'm talking out of my butt, but that sounds like a very good system of checks and ballances regarding judges who "play ball" with the likes of corrupt politicians. Pasquale, the justice system has grown so bad in the US with cathching the small fish and setting free the big fish, that it caused such a decline of believe in the law by the people as well as you show. But you make a good example of how some new law could have some effect still: obligation for representatives of the state to open their doings for the public review by law! You see, freedom and democracy has a lot to do with honesty and transparancy. If a strong law would forbid many under-the-table-connections between private and public interests, if it would be just forbidden to stay in office or to keep privileges or possessions if you misuse your public position for private interests, if the sanctions for misuse would be much harder, if the etats for the military-industrial-drug-laundary-msm-complex would be reduced and the welfare, education, infrastrucutre, cultural etats would be reaised, then you would regain a consciousness what a good law would be able to do. Chris Frenchy wrote:Was Files also at Roswell? I cant believe he was involved in everythingFiles certainly was not involved in everything, but once the CIA recruited many at once from the same pool, they used them for many things at once, cause they had them reliably on their marionette threads, cause each could be made whistleblower for the other, cause they knew each other's deeds or memeberships, so all remained silent. So maybe Files is telling a bit more than he actually participated, but I believe him that he really knew of others pretty close who really did. So at least Files is telling us the truth about how it works in this compartamentalized world of the secret services.