Page 2 of 8
To Tom......
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:37 pm
by Pennyworth
TOM....
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:49 pm
by Pennyworth
WE ARE PICKING UP THE PIECES AND PUTTING THEM IN THEIR PROPER AND PERSPECTIVE PLACEs
This is the reason why all of a sudden we are getting counter attacks discrediting the Kennedy conspiracy theorists by the way of megathon books.... costly mini-series etc....there is money backing to discredit our truths and findings because THEY don't want the truth to come out and be known....
Re: TOM....
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:28 pm
by Pennyworth
Paul Pennyworth wrote:WE ARE PICKING UP THE PIECES AND PUTTING THEM IN THEIR PROPER AND PERSPECTIVE PLACEs This is the reason why all of a sudden we are getting counter attacks discrediting the Kennedy conspiracy theorists by the way of megathon books.... costly mini-series etc....there is money backing to discredit our truths and findings because THEY don't want the truth to come out and be known....
Tom,
I am going to call you 'confused' from now on
lololololo.lololololololol!!!
Crowley, Hitler, and WW11......
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:11 pm
by Pennyworth
Aleister Crowley and The Bilderbergs...
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:46 pm
by Pennyworth
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:30 pm
by Pennyworth
tom jeffers wrote:i know this is going to come off as being really critical however i have to make this comment. I believe posts like this should not be allowed on a jfk forum. the topic shold be at least somewhat directly related to the assassination, coverup, key players etc. it is a big stretch to tie in crowley to the jfk killing. it is this reason why my involvement has decreased over the past few months. these posts discredit what this forum represents and does nothing to promote future use by those who might visit this forum in hopes of finding quality information about november 22, 1963. sorry paul, but i think those posts belong elsewhere.
check out the crowley/bilderberg posts
Crowley's deathbed statement...
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:50 pm
by Pennyworth
“Crowley finished his life as a sick, wasted heroin addict given to black rages and doubts about the value of his life’s work. His last words as he passed into a coma on December 1, 1947, were, “I am perplexed…” (Steve Turner, Hungry for Heaven, pp. 92,97,98).
Abbey Of Thelema....
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:05 am
by Pennyworth
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:55 am
by Pennyworth
Paul Pennyworth wrote:tom jeffers wrote:i know this is going to come off as being really critical however i have to make this comment. I believe posts like this should not be allowed on a jfk forum. the topic shold be at least somewhat directly related to the assassination, coverup, key players etc. it is a big stretch to tie in crowley to the jfk killing. it is this reason why my involvement has decreased over the past few months. these posts discredit what this forum represents and does nothing to promote future use by those who might visit this forum in hopes of finding quality information about november 22, 1963. sorry paul, but i think those posts belong elsewhere.Doest what thou wilt, Tom; although check out the release date on the white album....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles_%28album%29I see not everyone is as eagle-eyed as me...I caught this right away....Check out this release date:
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=am ... fpxql5ldae
CHECK OUT THIS RELEASE DATE:
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=am ... fpxql5ldae
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:59 am
by Pennyworth
Paul Pennyworth wrote:Paul Pennyworth wrote:tom jeffers wrote:i know this is going to come off as being really critical however i have to make this comment. I believe posts like this should not be allowed on a jfk forum. the topic shold be at least somewhat directly related to the assassination, coverup, key players etc. it is a big stretch to tie in crowley to the jfk killing. it is this reason why my involvement has decreased over the past few months. these posts discredit what this forum represents and does nothing to promote future use by those who might visit this forum in hopes of finding quality information about november 22, 1963. sorry paul, but i think those posts belong elsewhere.Doest what thou wilt, Tom; although check out the release date on the white album....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles_%28album%29I see not everyone is as eagle-eyed as me...I caught this right away....Check out this release date:
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=am ... 5ldaeCHECK OUT THIS RELEASE DATE: WITH THE BEATLES...
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=am ... fpxql5ldae
SAME ALBUM COVER...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meet_the_Beatles