David Atlee Phillips at LHO's press conference?

[katisha]

Very interesting, TJ. Do you know when that press conference took place - was it on the 22nd? (Sorry if it says somewhere - I couldn't see it).

[Bob]

Very good piece Tom. Katisha, the press conference took place Sunday night on the 24th of November. The same date as Oswald's murder earlier that morning. There is no doubt that they were already making Oswald out to be the clear patsy in the murder, as Wade had many things incorrect in the press conference, but things that made Oswald out to be the assassin for sure...at least in the minds of most Americans.

[bob franklin]

Regarding the lie detector test:http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/VSALETTER.htmI'd actually take this over a polygraph test. People can train their autonomic functions( I can make my heart skip one or even two beats, & once during an EEG I made one of the wave patterns do cool things - the doctor was impressed) but I don't think you can fiddle with stress in your vocal "fingerprint". Could be wrong, just an opinion.

[saracarter766]

Bob wrote:Frenchy, we will have to agree to disagree about the photo. Bob Franklin, at least to me, gave MORE credence that the photo was of Phillips after his photo enhancement. Again, the photo also shows a resemblence to Rutledge, but just because Mack says it is Rutledge does not make it fact. In terms of Mack, just listen to Marrs and Groden on the Alex Jones clip I posted above. Mack is a fraud. Listen to Marrs and Groden talk about what a farce the Discovery specials are concerning the JFK assassination. Do NOT just take Mack's word for things or MY word. Listen to Marrs and Groden. They are without a doubt, the two very best experts in JFK assassination research. Marrs has worked with Wim regarding Files, and has interviewed Jimmy. Groden's own web site has a link to this site. What does that tell you? It tells me that Wim and this site is a hell of a lot closer to the truth than the bullshit 6th floor museum at the TSBD that Mack runs. I used to like Mack when he tried telling the truth like he did in TMWKK. But like Judas, Benedict Arnold, Brutus and other historical figures, he betrayed the cause that he was once aligned with.To answer your polygraph question, I can't remember if Files ever took a polygraph exam, but there is a reason why court cases DO NOT allow them to be used as evidence. Because they are not reliable. Some obvious liars have passed them in the past, while some innocent people have failed them. I do think references are VERY credible, especially in the case of Shelton and Marvin.Finally...who asked you to leave? Didn't I say that your opinion is always welcome here, no matter what you believe? We are having a debate...plain and simple. That's all. Yes, I get a little riled up at times regarding things associated with Gary Mack. I think I have laid out the evidence as to why I feel Mack is a sellout and a fraud. David, you also have another big attribute...you come from Liverpool, the home of the greatest band of all time...the Beatles. bob did you know that your my hero lol. and i could'nt have said it better myself at what you just said in your post.and i too am a huge fan of the beatles.

[Bob]

Thanks Sara.Speaking of the Beatles, here is one of the most ironic songs ever by the Beatles, as John himself died because of a gun, as did JFK...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qE2Vdcv9Q_o

[bob franklin]

I wonder what that new facial recognition software for mac computers would do to help solve this question? Anybody with a mac?

[Bob]

I used to have a Mac a few years ago, but I don't any longer. However, I do have a friend that is a Mac geek so to speak, and he is also a JFK assassination buff. What does he need to do with this software?

[bob franklin]

It's basically picture sorting & locating software. I'm guessing it 'd be integral to the latest OS, maybe installable to an earlier one. The application uses facial recognition to sort & find your photos.Here's hoping they'll change the porting a little so it can be installed in linux & windblows.

[ThomZajac]

If it could be 'proven' that David Atlee Phillips was at Lee Harvey Oswald's press conference, that would be big news, wouldn't it? Does Wim have any interest in moving this little gem along?Anyone?

[Bob]

Put me down as a believer. I don't know about Wim, but he was the one who supplied me with the photo of Phillips under the road sign heading to CIA headquarters. That photo looks EXACTLY like the guy in the Oswald press conference. We KNOW that Agent Hosty was there from the FBI. He was Oswald's connection to the Feds. Doesn't it make sense somewhat the Phillips would be there as well, especially since Oswald wasn't killed before he was arrested? Also...and this is KEY...there are no notes or tapes from the Oswald interrogation. Why is that? The guy supposedly just shot the President of the United States. This was 1963...not 1763 in terms of police investigations. I think both Hosty and Phillips were there because they were worried that Oswald would blow his cover in front of the MSM. Hosty was worried because Oswald had warned him of the assassination. Phillips was worried because he was a conspirator and he tried to set Oswald up. Look at the press conference photo again. Phillips is listening VERY intently.