THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE:

JFK Assassination
Post Reply
Bruce Patrick Brychek
Senior Member
Posts: 3703
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:53 am

THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE:

Post by Bruce Patrick Brychek »

Wednesday
04.12.2017
1:43 a.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear Forum Members and Readers:

THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE. YOU WILL NEVER EXPERIENCE IT, OR SEE IT IN YOUR LIFETIME.

YOU WILL NEVER BE TOLD THE COMPLETE, HONEST, TRUTH ABOUT PEARL HARBOR, VIETNAM, LAOS, CAMBODIA, JFK, MX, MLK, RFK, THE OKLAHOMA BOMBING, 09.11.2001, FALSE FLAGS, and SO MANY OTHER ATROCITIES - EVER.

THEY WILL NEVER CHANGE THE HISTORY BOOKS !

Real Professional Journalism w/ high integrity should be the first draft of history. W/ today's Main Stream Media, "We the People..." won't get honesty unless they have a drone w/ a camera attached to a Time Machine.

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material
completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions
and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies,
thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation
of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?
Respectfully,
BB.


DEFENSE ONE:

U.S. ARMY EXPLORING “DEVASTATING” NEW WEAPON FOR USE IN WAR WITH RUSSIA:

A monorail dry-run test at Holloman Air Force Base in July 2013 had no payload and used three representative carbon-epoxy panels mounted on the top and sides of the sled.
by: Patrick Tucker April 11, 2017

The Kinetic Energy Projectile would be a tungsten warhead that moves at three times the speed of sound, destroying anything in its path. Were the United States to go to war with Russia, both sides could draw on deadly weapons that the world has never seen on a battlefield. On the Russian side, there are new and smaller tactical nuclear weapons. To counter them, the U.S. Army is taking another look at a “devastating” weapon it first tested in 2013: the Kinetic Energy Projectile, or KEP, a tungsten-based charge moving at three times the speed of sound that can destroy anything in its path.

“Think of it as a big shotgun shell,” Maj. Gen. William Hix, the Army’s director of strategy, plans and policy, said a few weeks ago at the Booz Allen Hamilton Direct Energy Summit. But unlike a shotgun shell, Hix said, the KEP moves at incredible speeds of “Mach 3 to Mach 6.”

Randy Simpson, a weapons programs manager at Lawrence Livermore National Lab, explains that kinetic energy projectiles are warheads that “take advantage of high terminal speeds to deliver much more energy onto a target than the chemical explosives they carry would deliver alone.”

Said Hix: “The way that they [Lawrence Livermore] have designed it is quite devastating. I would not want to be around it. Not much can survive it. If you are in a main battle tank, if you’re a crew member, you might survive but the vehicle will be non-mission capable, and everything below that will level of protection will be dead. That’s what I am talking about.”

1. US Army Exploring ‘Devastating’ New Weapon For Use In War with Russia.

2. Iran Expected an Economic Boost from the Nuclear Deal. It’s Not Happening.

3. Can US Warplanes Evade Russian Air Defenses ? We May Soon Find Out in Syria. The general emphasized that the exploration was in a conceptual phase and not yet any sort of actual program: “We’re looking at ways we might — key, might — use that capability in one of our existing launch platforms as part of the weapons suite that we have.”He said the main contender for a launcher would be the Army Tactical Missile System, made by Lockheed Martin.

In October 2013, an Air Force test team strapped the projectile to a “sled” on the high-speed test track at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico. The goal: to get it moving faster than Mach 3 and see how it might actually work in the air. The test showed that the warhead design worked; it also provided data to help simulations and modeling.

Why would the U.S. military, which has put untold billions of dollars into precision weapons over several decades, need such a blunt and terrifying weapon ? To counter small Russian nuclear weapons.

“The Russians … maintain their tactical nuclear stockpile in ways that we have not,” Hix said. Potomac Institute head Philip Karber, who helped write the Pentagon’s Russia New Generation Warfare Study, offered a bit more explanation when Defense One spoke to him in January. While the United States retains just a few of its once-large arsenal of tactical nukes, Karber estimates that Russia currently has anywhere from 2,000 to 5,000 of the weapons.

“Look at what the Russians have been doing in low-fission, high-fusion, sub-kiloton tactical nuclear technology,” he said. “It appears that they are putting a big effort…in both miniaturizing the warheads and using sub-kiloton low-yield warheads.”

Why is that significant ? By shrinking the warhead, you can shoot it out of a wider variety of guns, including, potentially, 152-millimeter tank cannons.

DON'T MISS: The Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyer USS Mustin (DDG 89) fires a Tomahawk Land Attack Missile during a 2014 exercise.

The US Is About to Stop Buying Tomahawk Missiles, Like the Ones That Hit Syria. A U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor approaches a U.S. Air Force KC-10 Extender from the 908th Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron before aerial refueling during a Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve mission Feb. 12, 2017.

Can US Warplanes Evade Russian Air Defenses ?

THE DRONES OF ISIS: Stockholm Attack a Reminder We Have No Way to Fight Low-Tech Terror. North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un watches a ballistic rocket launch. What Are America’s Options on North Korea ?

“They’ve announced that the follow-on tank to the Armata will have a 152-millimeter gun missile launcher. They’re talking about it having a nuclear capability. And you go, ‘You’re talking about building a nuclear tank, a tank that fires a nuke?’

Well, that’s the implication,” said Karber. Hix says that the use of tactical battlefield nuclear weapons, even very low-level ones, is not part of official Russian military doctrine, but it is a capability that they are increasingly eager to show off (and discuss) to intimidate neighbors and adversaries.

“They certainly exercise the use of those weapons in many of their exercises, including the one that participated in the parking of 30,000 to 40,000 soldiers on the Ukrainian border right before [the 2014 invasion of] Crimea.

That coercive intimidation is a part of their design,” he said. And while even Soviet generals may have shied away from using tactical nukes, Blix said, Putin’s military is “a lot more inclined philosophically to see the utility of them.

”Patrick Tucker is technology editor for Defense One. He’s also the author of The Naked Future: What Happens in a World That Anticipates Your Every Move? (Current, 2014). Previously, Tucker was deputy editor for The Futurist for nine years. Tucker has written about emerging technology in Slate.
Slav
Senior Member
Posts: 4225
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:53 am

THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE:

Post by Slav »

There will never be peace and the drug trafficking pays for all the wars they go hand in hand .

There will never be peace I expect a big war on the horizon and there will always be drugs.

Think about it, drugs are on every street every city every town every neighborhood everywhere , now how is that type of distribution possible.

Just imagine if we add up all those drugs currently on the streets it would be enough to fill more than
1000 53 foot trailers.

Who has the power to do this ? It's all hand in hand .
kenmurray
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE:

Post by kenmurray »

Afghan Overdose: Inside Opium Trade.....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6psfGxfc4lg
Bob
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE:

Post by Bob »

Part of President Dwight D. Eisenhower's farewell address:

"A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

"Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peace time, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

"Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United State corporations."This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

"We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."
Bruce P. Brychek
Global Moderator, Senior Member
Posts: 5065
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:53 am

THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE:

Post by Bruce P. Brychek »

Friday
01.08.2021
6:48 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK RFK MLK Forum Members and Readers:

04.12.2017 - I originally Posted and Circulated this challenging Headline and Supporting Material.

01.08.2021 - In the Unabridged History of the United States, War(s) and Warfare are the only thing that has ever "saved the totality of a plunging American country, citizenry, and economy."

W/o belaboring the point, the U.S. economy is sinking in quicksand w/ a simultaneous failure to realize the chaos and crisis level that "We the People..." are perched upon.

Counter-arguments:

* "We the People..." were given $600.00, like Judas' 30 pieces of silver, and
* "We the People..." have out Little Blue nosebag, and
* "We the People..." will be rid of the Boogeyman, Trump, on 01.20.2021.
* Let's take a snap-shot of the Totality of "We the People..." and our trajectory then.
* Meanwhile, all is well in Chicago, Illinois. "We the People..." are wearing Blue nosebags, and some are being inoculated. All is good... Unless you're a victim...that truth is beyond ugly and growing.

www.heyjackass.com


As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material
completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions
and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies,
thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation
of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?
Respectfully,
BB.
bspez
Senior Member
Posts: 1290
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:48 am

Re: THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE:

Post by bspez »

I've always thought that Eisenhower's warning about the military industrial complex was one of the most hypocritical speeches ever given by a president. He had just spent eight years giving the military industrial complex everything they asked for with the purchase of 1400 plus nuclear bombs, plus all the delivery systems, bombers, missiles, bases, the first nuclear armed submarine. This was enough nuclear weapons to blow up the world multiple times, but he just kept buying because they were selling. During his watch he saw the CIA doing whatever political intrigue was necessary to secure profits for US corporations around the world. There was a lot of profit in peace. The economy was booming. There was as much profit in preparing for war as there was in war itself. There was a good 10 year bonanza for the military industrial complex with the nuclear arms buildup. When that reached an end, and with efforts at nuclear disarmament, it was back to war for another 10 year bonanza for the military industrial complex in Vietnam. And there was relative peace from 1975 until 1990 broken by the first gulf war, but that was a limited war. From 2001 to the present, the military industrial complex got another bonanza after the attacks on 9/11. What a coincidence that one of the biggest war profiteers was Haliburton, whose former CEO was the vice president when the troops were deployed to Afghanistan.
Post Reply