KGB IN 1967 CONCLUDED THE U.S. DEEP STATE REMOVED JFK:

JFK Assassination
Post Reply
Bruce Patrick Brychek
Senior Member
Posts: 3703
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:53 am

KGB IN 1967 CONCLUDED THE U.S. DEEP STATE REMOVED JFK:

Post by Bruce Patrick Brychek »

Sunday
01.21.2018
11:09 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear Forum Members and Readers:

THE KGB IN 1967 CONCLUDED THAT THE U.S. DEEP STATE HAD REMOVED JFK.

The deeper that I studied and analyzed Majestic Twelve, and MJ-1 and MJ-2, the
Accuracy of the Alleged Innocence of both the KGB and Russia with the Removal
of JFK comes into clearer focus.

The likelihood that both the KGB and Russia were additional placebo Patsy's becomes
more probable then possible.

You must never loose focus of the fact that James James Angleton was Director of Counter
Intelligence for the CIA for 20 years from 1954 - 1974. This is of Insurmountable Probative
Value and the Deepest Understanding.

Remember and understand that if JJA looked or spoke in one direction, the likelihood of
the truth being a 180 degree polar opposite could often be assumed in retrospect. One
of JJA's life long hobbies and methods of both relaxation and study was his deep love and
fascination w/ the study of Multi-Level Chess.

In addition, JJA's Multi-Level Roles in the Warren Commission are portions of what I
consider THE HOLY GRAIL OF THE JFK REMOVAL.

A Soviet informant told the FBI & CIA in 1967 that the KGB had concluded that monopolists
and the military industrial complex had murdered JFK.

A Soviet informant code named Shamrock told the CIA & FBI in 1967 that USSR was
upset about the JFK assassination and the KGB had internally concluded that JFK was
murdered by American monopolists and members of the military-industrial complex.

Web site https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 691001/JFK files:

KGB had 'trusted relationship' with long time Warren Commission critic Mark Lane.

Mark Lane, the New York attorney who challenged the findings of the commission that
investigated the JFK assassination had a “trusted relationship” with the Soviet KGB,
according to a KGB informant for the CIA.

Lane’s relationship with the KGB, which was revealed in new files released from the investigation
of the assassination of President John F Kennedy, was disclosed by a little-known Soviet
informant code named Shamrock. That source, a KGB official who worked in the Soviet
delegation office at the United Nations, contacted the CIA on Jan. 16, 1967, and agreed to
share information with both the CIA and FBI, an April 4, 1967, FBI memo shows.

Shamrock’s name was made public for the first time among the more than 35,500 files
connected to the Kennedy investigation that were released late last year.

Lane, who died at age 89 in May 2016, first represented the mother of Kennedy assassin
Lee Harvey Oswald as the Warren Commission conducted its investigation.

In 1966, he published the best-selling Rush to Judgment, which criticized the commission’s
work as sloppy and incomplete.

A Nov. 7, 1967, memorandum from FBI official W.A. Branigan to William Sullivan, the bureau’s
long time intelligence chief, said the information provided by Shamrock about Lane would be
passed to the White House if Sullivan approved.

The Lane file included claims that Lane, a one-time Democratic member of the New York Assembly,
was once investigated for sodomy by the Queens County, N.Y., district attorney and had once given
two women “hand printed instructions … in order that they could perform upon his person perverted sexual acts of a sadistic and masochistic nature.”

The KGB’s contact with Lane, the FBI memo said, was Boris Orehkov, a former official at the
Soviet Union’s UN delegation.

A Jan. 9, 1968, FBI report released as part of the JFK files said that an FBI information identified
only as "NY 5812-S" said the KGB had given Lane the code name “Kram.”

“The source stated that BORIS OREKHOV, a KGB officer, assigned to the NY residency, had had
two meetings with LANE and had established a trusted relationship with him.”

Soviet reaction to killing: Beyond informing on Lane, Shamrock told the CIA and FBI that the
Soviet leadership was upset about Kennedy’s assassination, which “was a great loss, not only
for the United States and the Soviet Union, but for the whole world,” Branigan wrote Sullivan on
April 4, 1967.“

According to Shamrock, the Soviets felt that they could trust President Kennedy and could deal
with him on a cooperative basis," Branigan wrote. "Shamrock further stated that the Soviets
mourned President Kennedy’s death, a situation which Shamrock considered very unique inasmuch
as the person being mourned was the leader of another country.”

As a result of long KGB study, “the KGB concluded that President Kennedy was killed by
representatives of a group of monopolists, characterized as the military-industrial complex in
the United States,” Branigan wrote to Sullivan.

“The KGB felt that President Kennedy had tried to limit the activities of this group of monopolists
and therefore they planned his assassination.”

CIA-FBI fight over informants: Shamrock became part of the fight between the CIA, led by its counterintelligence chief James Angleton, and the FBI over the value of information provided by
a series of informants and defectors.

Angleton believed that most KGB defectors and informants were planted by the KGB, an idea
promoted by defector Anatoly Golitsyn, whom Angleton considered a reliable source. That
skepticism led the CIA to interrogate another Soviet defector, former KGB agent Yuri Nosenko,
for three years before finally acknowledging that Nosenko was telling the truth.

“The information furnished by Shamrock is very similar to that previously furnished to us by Yuri Nosenko, a Soviet defector whose bona fides has not been established,” Branigan wrote Sullivan.
“We feel we should disseminate this data since we have previously disseminated the information
we received from Yuri Nosenko regarding the assassination of even though we recognized some
of the data was not subject to proof, particularly, that occurring within the Soviet Union,” Branigan wrote.

“We feel that by documenting Shamrock as a ‘confidential informant, contact with whom has been insufficient to establish his reliability,’ we will alert other agencies that the information has not been established as true,” he wrote.

Shamrock’s name has been published only once, in the 1994 book Wedge by author Mark Riebling
that chronicled the longstanding fight over intelligence between the CIA and FBI.

Angleton considered Shamrock to be “bogus,” Riebling wrote, and that even Sullivan began to
suspect the FBI’s good luck in generating new sources of intelligence. As a result, Riebling wrote, Sullivan shared some FBI data with Golitsyn to help determine if the bureau was getting correct information.

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material
completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions
and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies,
thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation
of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?
Respectfully,
BB.
Bruce P. Brychek
Global Moderator, Senior Member
Posts: 5065
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:53 am

KGB IN 1967 CONCLUDED THE U.S. DEEP STATE REMOVED JFK:

Post by Bruce P. Brychek »

Thursday
12.31.2020
11:08 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK RFK MLK Forum Members and Readers:

01.21.2018 - I originally Posted this important Headline and Supporting Material.

Slav provided additional important information.

Please take note of who the KGB in 1967 went on record as stating who the KGB
felt had Removed President JFK.

As we begin 2021 consider who the KGB stated in 1967 caused the Removal JFK
in 1963.

I submit that the Metamorphosis and Evolution of the Deep State from 11.22.1963
has directly caused, and/or indirectly allowed to occur, The Totality of The State of
Chaos in the U.S., as we begin the New Year.

Why ?

What is the Beginning Game, the Middle Game, and the End Game in your Mind's
Eye

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material
completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions
and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies,
thoughts, or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation
of JFK Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?
Respectfully,
BB.
Post Reply