KREMLIN TOUTS DAD OF ALL BOMBS:

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

04.12.2017:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:THE COLD WAR IS PROCEEDING IN SEVERAL COUNTRIES, AND ON SEVERAL FRONTS. (04.12.2017, BB.)Weapons proliferation is proceeding with NEW, IMPROVED, STATE OF THE ART WAYS TO KILL IN MOREWAYS THAN EVER BEFORE.Remember: THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE. YOU WILL NOT SEE PEACE IN YOUR LIFE TIME. AND YOUWILL NEVER GET THE TRUTH ABOUT PEARL HARBOR, VIET NAM, LAOS, CAMBODIA, JFK, MX, MLK, RFK,THE OKLAHOMA BOMBING, 09.11.2001, FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS IN A COMPLETE TRUTHFUL FOREMATFROM THE U.S. GOVERNMENT - EVER. THEY WILL NEVER CHANGE THE HISTORY BOOKS. (04.12.2017,BB.)DEFENSE ONE:U.S. ARMY EXPLORING “DEVASTATING” NEW WEAPON FOR USE IN WAR WITH RUSSIA: A monorail dry-run test at Holloman Air Force Base in July 2013 had no payload and used three representative carbon-epoxy panels mounted on the top and sides of the sled.BY: PATRICK TUCKERAPRIL 11, 2017The Kinetic Energy Projectile would be a tungsten warhead that moves at three times the speed of sound, destroying anything in its path.Were the United States to go to war with Russia, both sides could draw on deadly weapons that the world has never seen on a battlefield. On the Russian side, there are new and smaller tactical nuclear weapons. To counter them, the U.S. Army is taking another look at a “devastating” weapon it first tested in 2013: the Kinetic Energy Projectile, or KEP, a tungsten-based charge moving at three times the speed of sound that can destroy anything in its path.“Think of it as a big shotgun shell,” Maj. Gen. William Hix, the Army’s director of strategy, plansand policy, said a few weeks ago at the Booz Allen Hamilton Direct Energy Summit. But unlike a shotgun shell, Hix said, the KEP moves at incredible speeds of “Mach 3 to Mach 6.”Randy Simpson, a weapons programs manager at Lawrence Livermore National Lab, explains that kinetic energy projectiles are warheads that “take advantage of high terminal speeds to deliver much more energy onto a target than the chemical explosives they carry would deliver alone.” Said Hix: “The way that they [Lawrence Livermore] have designed it is quite devastating. I would not want to be around it. Not much can survive it. If you are in a main battle tank, if you’re a crew member, you might survive but the vehicle will be non-mission capable, and everything below that will level of protection will be dead. That’s what I am talking about.”1US Army Exploring ‘Devastating’ New Weapon For Use In War with Russia.2Iran Expected an Economic Boost from the Nuclear Deal. It’s Not Happening.3Can US Warplanes Evade Russian Air Defenses ? We May Soon Find Out in Syria.The general emphasized that the exploration was in a conceptual phase and not yet any sort of actual program: “We’re looking at ways we might — key, might — use that capability in one of our existing launch platforms as part of the weapons suite that we have.”He said the main contender for a launcher would be the Army Tactical Missile System, made by Lockheed Martin.In October 2013, an Air Force test team strapped the projectile to a “sled” on the high-speed test track at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico. The goal: to get it moving faster than Mach 3 and see how it might actually work in the air. The test showed that the warhead design worked; it also provided data to help simulations and modeling.Why would the U.S. military, which has put untold billions of dollars into precision weapons over several decades, need such a blunt and terrifying weapon ? To counter small Russian nuclear weapons.“The Russians … maintain their tactical nuclear stockpile in ways that we have not,” Hix said.Potomac Institute head Philip Karber, who helped write the Pentagon’s Russia New Generation Warfare Study, offered a bit more explanation when Defense One spoke to him in January. While the United States retains just a few of its once-large arsenal of tactical nukes, Karber estimates that Russia currently has anywhere from 2,000 to 5,000 of the weapons.“Look at what the Russians have been doing in low-fission, high-fusion, sub-kiloton tactical nuclear technology,” he said. “It appears that they are putting a big effort…in both miniaturizing the warheads and using sub-kiloton low-yield warheads.”Why is that significant ? By shrinking the warhead, you can shoot it out of a wider variety of guns, including, potentially, 152-millimeter tank cannons.DON'T MISS:The Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyer USS Mustin (DDG 89) fires a Tomahawk Land Attack Missile during a 2014 exercise. The US Is About to Stop Buying Tomahawk Missiles, Like the Ones That Hit Syria.A U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor approaches a U.S. Air Force KC-10 Extender from the 908th Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron before aerial refueling during a Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve mission Feb. 12, 2017. Can US Warplanes Evade Russian Air Defenses ?THE DRONES OF ISIS:Stockholm Attack a Reminder We Have No Way to Fight Low-Tech Terror.North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un watches a ballistic rocket launch. What Are America’s Options on North Korea ?“They’ve announced that the follow-on tank to the Armata will have a 152-millimeter gun missilelauncher. They’re talking about it having a nuclear capability. And you go, ‘You’re talking about building a nuclear tank, a tank that fires a nuke?’ Well, that’s the implication,” said Karber.Hix says that the use of tactical battlefield nuclear weapons, even very low-level ones, is not part of official Russian military doctrine, but it is a capability that they are increasingly eager to show off (and discuss) to intimidate neighbors and adversaries.“They certainly exercise the use of those weapons in many of their exercises, including the one that participated in the parking of 30,000 to 40,000 soldiers on the Ukrainian border right before [the 2014 invasion of] Crimea. That coercive intimidation is a part of their design,” he said.And while even Soviet generals may have shied away from using tactical nukes, Blix said, Putin’s military is “a lot more inclined philosophically to see the utility of them.”Patrick Tucker is technology editor for Defense One. He’s also the author of The Naked Future: What Happens in a World That Anticipates Your Every Move? (Current, 2014). Previously, Tucker was deputy editor for The Futurist for nine years. Tucker has written about emerging technology in Slate.REMEMBER , THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE. 04.12.2017, BB.As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts,or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFKResearchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

04.13.2017:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:THE U.S. JUST DROPPED THE LARGEST NON-NUCLEAR BOMB EVER - "THE MOTHER OF ALL BOMBS."SUDDENLY THE THREAT OF MAJOR WARS AGAINST OR WITH THE U.S. ARE INCREASING AT GEOMETRIC PROPORTIONS.THE CIA, THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONS, THE NSA, THE PENTAGON,THE STOCKHOLDERS HAVE ALL GOT TO BE ECSTATIC.INVEST, OR MOVE YOUR FUNDS, TO WAR RELATED COMPANIES NOW. THIS ALSO HAS TO BE ANOTHER BOON TO AMAZON.COUNTRY JOE AND THE FISH, WHERE ARE YOU WHEN WE NEED YOU AGAIN ?SUDDENLY PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP IS THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION'S AND THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES' MAN OF THE YEAR, 04.13.2017, BB.US HIT ISIS WITH LARGEST NON-NUCLEAR BOMB EVER USED:SPICER: US DROPS “POWERFUL” BOMB IN AFGHANISTAN: WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. forces in Afghanistan on Thursday struck an Islamic State tunnel complex in eastern Afghanistan with "the mother of all bombs," the largest non-nuclear weapon ever used in combat by the U.S. military, Pentagon officials said.The bomb, known officially as a GBU-43B, or massive ordnance air blast weapon, unleashes 11 tons of explosives. When it was developed in the early 2000s, the Pentagon did a formal review of legal justification for its combat use.The Pentagon said it had no early estimate of deaths or damage caused by its attack, which President Donald Trump called a "very, very successful mission."The U.S. military headquarters in Kabul said in a statement that the bomb was dropped at 7:32 p.m. local time Thursday on a tunnel complex in Achin district of Nangarhar province, where the Afghan affiliate of the Islamic State group has been operating. The target was close to the Pakistani border.The U.S. estimates 600 to 800 IS fighters are present in Afghanistan, mostly in Nangarhar. The U.S. has concentrated heavily on combatting them while also supporting Afghan forces battling the Taliban. Just last week a U.S. Army Special Forces soldier, Staff Sgt. Mark R. De Alencar, 37, of Edgewood, Maryland, was killed in action in Nangarhar.The MOAB is a custom-made Air Force weapon that has been in the arsenal for more than a decade but never used on the battlefield, although it was available throughout the Iraq war. It is designed to hit softer targets such as surface facilities, tunnel entrances and troop concentrations. It is pushed out the rear of the launching aircraft, guided to its target by GPS and slowed by a parachute.A separate non-nuclear weapon known as the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, which is larger in its physical dimensions but carries a smaller load of conventional explosives, is designed to take out deeply buried targets like reinforced bunkers. The MOP has never been used in combat.In its 2003 review of the legality of using the MOAB, the Pentagon concluded that it could not be called an indiscriminate killer under the Law of Armed Conflict."Although the MOAB weapon leaves a large footprint, it is discriminate and requires a deliberate launching toward the target," the review said. It added: "It is expected that the weapon will have a substantial psychological effect on those who witness its use."Adam Stump, a Pentagon spokesman, said the bomb was dropped from a U.S. MC-130 special operations transport. He said the bomb had been brought to Afghanistan "some time ago" for potential use.Army Gen. John W. Nicholson, commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, said in a written statement that the strike was designed to minimize the risk to Afghan and U.S. forces conducting clearing operations in the Achin area "while maximizing the destruction" of IS fighters and facilities. He said IS has been using improvised explosive devices, bunkers and tunnels to strengthen its defenses."This is the right munition to reduce these obstacles and maintain the momentum of our offensive against ISIS-K," he added, using the U.S. military's acronym for the IS affiliate.Ismail Shinwari, the governor of Achin district, said the U.S. attack was carried out in a remote mountainous area with no civilian homes nearby and that there had been no reports of injured civilians. He said there has been heavy fighting in the area in recent weeks between Afghan forces and IS militants.White House spokesman Sean Spicer said IS fighters had used the tunnels and caves in Achin to maneuver freely."The United States takes the fight against ISIS very seriously and in order to defeat the group we must deny them operational space, which we did," Spicer said.As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts,or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFKResearchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

06.03.2017:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:While Superficial Attacks and Overviews from the American Main Steam Media, and TalkingHeads escalate daily, weekly, and monthly, ...WHERE IS THE FOCUS IN AMERICA TODAY ?THERE IS NO DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA. THAT IS A PRIMARY FALLACY.THERE IS NO PROFIT IN PEACE. REMEMBER THAT.As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts,or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFKResearchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

[kenmurray]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-g8CEK4gf0

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

09.09.2017:Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:09.18.2007 - Almost 10 years ago to the date, I Originally Posted this Abrasive, Apocryphal, Caustic, Distilling, Important, Visionary Headline, and Supporting Material.This did not generate the attention and discussion that I had hoped it might. Perhaps today ! (09.09.2017, BB).Rumors Swirl That Russia Has Dropped 'Father of All Bombs'Did Putin drop the largest conventional bomb in the world in Syria?By Kyle MizokamiSep 8, 2017 Unconfirmed reports from Syria claim that Russia has dropped what is considered the largest, most powerful non-nuclear bomb in the world. According to reports on Twitter, the bomb was allegedly dropped near the Syrian city of Deir ez-Zor.The gigantic bomb, officially the Aviation Thermobaric Bomb of Increased Power (ATBIP), is also know as the "Father of All Bombs" (FOAB). FOAB is a so-called thermobaric weapon, a type of munition that releases a cloud of flammable gas over the target before detonating it. In addition to the heat of the explosion, this approach also creates a deadly pressure wave that is particularly damaging against enclosed spaces, including tanks, caves, and bunkers.Getty Wotjek LaskiAccording to The War Zone, FOAB disperses a cloud of ethylene oxide and aluminum before detonating it. Ethylene oxide is a flammable, colorless gas, a byproduct of consumer products such as antifreeze. Ethylene oxide rapidly expands upon heating, causing fire and explosion.At the time of the bomb's first test in 2007, the then-deputy chief of the Russian General Staff claimed it was "comparable to nuclear weapons." That's a little hyperbolic, but he's not entirely wrong. At 44 tons of explosive yield, the FOAB approaches the yield of a tactical nuclear weapon. The American W48 warhead, part of the M454 155-millimeter nuclear artillery shell, had an explosive yield of 70 to 100 tons.The bomb is called the "Father of All Bombs" to place it in the same class as the 11-ton American GBU-43/B, also known as the "Mother of All Bombs." MOAB was recently used in Afghanistan against a series of cave complexes used by ISIS forces.Exactly how the bomb was deployed over Syria is a good question. As The War Zone points out, Russian footage of the 2007 test (see above) implies a Russian Aerospace Force Tu-160 "Blackjack" strategic bomber was the delivery vehicle, but the actual drop footage appears to show the bomb rolling out the back ramp of a transport aircraft. The American MOAB is rolled out the back ramp of a modified C-130 Hercules transport aircraft.Deir ez-Zor has been heavily battered by almost all factions in the Syrian Civil War, having been bombed by Russian Aerospace Force bombers, the U.S. Air Force, and even Iranian short-range ballistic missiles.Read more at The War ZoneThe U.S. Shot Down a Syrian Plane. Russia Is Angry. Now What?Why the Tomahawk Missile Was Trump's Weapon of Choice Against SyriaMore FromWEAPONSSeismic Detective Weighs In on North Korea's Latest Nuclear TestThe Marines Are Using These Badass Amphibious Vehicles to Rescue Hurricane Harvey VictimsUS Shoots Down Ballistic Missile in Hawaii TestOne Weird Trick Could Delay the Air Force's Next Generation TankerSouth Korea Says North Fires Missile Over JapanThe Air Force Uses Ex-Nuclear Missiles to Loft Satellites Into SpaceAmerica Is Building a New, Stealthy Nuclear Cruise MissileThe Secret Soviet Space Weapon Mistaken for a UFOWhat We Know About the U.S.'s New Nuclear MissileThe Army Is Getting Deadlier Stryker Armored Vehicles to Protect Europe From RussiaMILITARY WEAPONS SYRIA FOAB THERMOBARIC WEAPONS RUSSIA SAYS IT'S WORKING ON A DRONE THAT CAN IMITATE ANY SUB RUSSIA TESTS A NEW MISSILE THAT CAN DESTROY SATELLITES RUSSIA PROVIDED THE MISSILE THAT SHOT DOWN MALAYSIA AIRLINES FLIGHT 17—INVESTIGATORSTHE SIMPLE EMAIL THAT LET RUSSIA HACK THE DNCDIVER IS DROPPED NEAR APOLLO 11 VIDEOWHAT A CAMERA DROPPED IN LAVA LOOKS LIKEMORE FROM WEAPONSNewsletterDigital EditionsAbout UsMedia KitPress RoomContact UsCommunity GuidelinesAdvertise OnlineAbout Our AdsCustomer ServiceSubscribeOther Hearst SubscriptionsGive a GiftEvents & PromotionsGiveawaysBeing GreenWhy Did I Get This Ad?BestProductsHearst CorporationA PART OF HEARST DIGITAL MEDIAPopular Mechanics participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means Popular Mechanics gets paid commissions on purchases made through our links to retailer sites.©2017 Hearst Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Privacy PolicyYour California Privacy RightsTerms of UseSite MapAs always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts,or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFKResearchers who may not be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

[Bruce P. Brychek]

Saturday
11.23.2024
8:00 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear Global Members & Readers:

09.18.2007 - I originally Posted this Headline & Supporting Material. I kept updating
w/ a firm belief that we would eventually poke the Bear once too many times. Are
we there ?

11.23.2024 - Does Russia actually have much more powerful weapons that the U.S.
& everybody else ?

Remember NASA basically quit the Space Race & became the Red Headed Step
Child of Russia on Space Projects.

By the way see if the Internet still shows all of the U.S. Abandoned, Collapsing
sites.

thoughts...
best...
bb.