DRUGS, SEX, AND MONEY

[john boland]

Hello, my name is John Boland and I am forty years old, a graduate of Clemson University and USMC Veteran. I live in Lyman SC. I have been fascinated by the Presential murder since chilhood listening to my mother, grandmother and uncle all give accouts of their whereabouts on the Day in Dealy Plaza. We will always remember our location when historic events happen. In my generation it was the attempted Reagan Assassination, the Space Shuttle tragedy, and obviously 9 - 11.I have often wondered what was the final clincher that JFK performed solely or performed with another to actually justify his enemies to commit murder. Was it the deportation of Carlos Marcello (High ranking Mob offical with drug convictions) which surely was seen as a knife in the back in the eyes of Mafia given their support in the 1960 election. I also consider the mutal mistress, who he and Sam Traficante suppossedly shared. Jealously and rejection from a former lover has been the source of thousand upon thousand of confrontations. It is old as time itself. All the characters in this 1960's Shakesperean tragedy all had feelings, emotions, and egos.The document in which JFK approved or was going to approve reducing America's involvement with the Vietnam war is also to be considered. By shortening the war, somebody wasn't going to get paid. Loss of Billions of dollars would be grounds for murder in some peoples eyes. So there are the three reasons most violent crimes are committed in this country. Drug, Sex, and Money. Some people even call it SAM or Sex, alcohol and money. Either way, it is a recipe for evil and diaster 365 out of 365.The toes JFK stepped whether purposely or by mistake were connected at all levels of Government. I guess when he pissed off one, he pissed off all of them. When you have that many enemies at that high a level you don't stand a chance.John Jay BolandClemson University '89USMC Veteran

[Bob]

Hi John. Welcome to the forum. First of all, thank you for your service, and also, I am very good friends with a Clemson graduate, who probably is about your age. I don't want to give too much away, but he was on the great Clemson football team in the era in the late 80's and early 90's that would bring 7 or 8 players into the NFL. He was a starter on that great defense. He told me some great stories about Clemson, especially about the football team. Anyway, your take is a good one. Drugs, sex and money is what Washington D.C. is all about. It's been that way for years, decades and generations. Take a good look at what this website can offer in terms of historical facts, and your theory really takes shape. JFK saw this, and tried to change it. Okay, maybe not the sex part. But JFK saw was what unbrideled power and corruption could do. That's why he wanted to change the oil depletion allowance, which would cost Big Oil dearly. That's why he was making sweeping changes to the Federal Reserve, which would hurt Big Banking. That's why he was going to get the U.S. out of Vietnam and stop the blood money to the war profiteers like Brown and Root, Lockheed and others. That's why he was going to tear the CIA into 1,000 pieces. The CIA later turned drug running into a big profit maker during Iran/Contra and Mena. And yes, he let RFK turn on the Mob big time, even after the arrangement Joseph Kennedy had prior to the 1960 election with the Mob. And JFK had MANY women, including the mistress of Sam Giancana, and of course Marilyn Monroe. So JFK would have affected a lot in DC had his plans gone through. But money and power were the two biggest reasons he was killed, although sex and drugs played a part as well.

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

08.14.2013Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:06.02.2008 - Mr. John Boland Posted this attention getting Headline.John presented some piercingly accurate, laser focused facts, information, statements,and questions. When John first Posted this I always thought that a deep and probativediscussion would follow.Mr. Bob Fox followed with an exhaustive, intelligent expansion that was analytical,and probative. This strongly enhanced the discussion. But then nothing else.Worth the read still, in my opinion.Any more recent analyses, investigations, readings, research, study, or writingsthat anybody can add, either Pro or Con ?Comments ?Respectfully,BB.