Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

[ThomZajac]

All I can do is agree with you Pasquale. Gary Mack KNOWS there was a conspiracy to kill JFK, but he has sold out for a better life (integrity non withstanding). 'Hard evidence' is simply the best vehicle he can pilot to drive away from reality.It's like Richard Nixon's "National security!" defense. When people are knowingly lying to such a high degree they need to have some form of refuge.If I were a rich man who was not afraid of death, I'd buy the Dal Tex building and open a real JFK assassination museum.Anyone want to fund me? (I'll worry about my lifespan some other time).

[saracarter766]

pasquale i enjoyed reading that great job dude.

[kenmurray]

Here what some people say about Gary ''the lone censor" Mack: http://www.prouty.org/boycott.html

[saracarter766]

kenmurray thanks for posting that. woo doggie looks like mr mack has pissed off some people now has'nt he lol?and god bless marina oswald and lee oswalds daughters as well.

[kenmurray]

Sara, what a joke that building has become since Mack became curator. I wouldn't waste my time going through it. I would prefer running into Robert Groden in Dealey Plaza.

[saracarter766]

i totally agree i definately would love to meet robert groden.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

Thanks guys!So, basically Mr. Mack and his proxy spokemen can use the phrase "hard evidence" to mean anything they want. That really makes me grind my teeth. He's become kind of like an accessory after the fact. I'm being totally serious. Murder doesn't have a statute of limitations on it. Then again, Mack isn't really being legally held to any real standards here, so he couldn't be convicted of being an accessory after the fact.Come to think of it, the Warren Commission was not a court of law either, so, they weren't held to the same standards as a court of law either, which means they could ignore evidence and twist facts and there wasn't a defense attorney there to yell "OBJECTION!" because it wasn't a court of law.It was a joke.

[saracarter766]

right on the money pasquale.

[ThomZajac]

Oswald was never convicted. Hence he died an innocent man in the eyes of the law.The Warren Report holds no legal weight. It is merely an opinion presented by the government.But legally, the case remains open. Legally, it is still unresolved.At least, that is how I understand it.

[saracarter766]

he sure did i highly respect oswald for protesting his innocence to the very end i completely agree with you ThomZajac. i love how they were never able to gain a confession from him.