Limo window crack+dent prove 4th shot

[ChristophMessner]

The center of the crack on this window (was it the front window or the intermediate window?) is very far left. So it could not have come from a headshot fragment (this would have had to travel through JFK's face to create that crack there) and it could not have come from any single bullet (cause this traveled far more to the right from the shooter's perspective). Together with the huge dent in the window frame which could NOT have been caused by the other glass crack reasonand together with the shot from the front which is proved by Zapruder filmyou have proved at least a 4th shot, if not a 5th.

[Bob]

More evidence that the lone nutters NEVER bring up.

[kenmurray]

Bob wrote:More evidence that the lone nutters NEVER bring up.Bob I'm sure that Arlen Von Pein HAS the answer though.

[Bob]

kenmurray wrote:Bob wrote:More evidence that the lone nutters NEVER bring up.Bob I'm sure that Arlen Von Pein HAS the answer though.Yes...he'll say that when Greer braked suddenly, Kellerman's head hit the windshield AND the frame. The magic windshield theory!

[ThomZajac]

The damage was there BEFORE Dallas, you nitwits, from when they were practicing.

[kenmurray]

Here is an interesting video done by Gil Jesus:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QLFOzws ... re=related

[Bob]

kenmurray wrote:Here is an interesting video done by Gil Jesus:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QLFOzws ... elatedVERY interesting vid Ken. People really need to look at all of Gil's vids. They are outstanding!http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=GJJdude&view=videos

[kenmurray]

Bob wrote:kenmurray wrote:Here is an interesting video done by Gil Jesus:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QLFOzws ... elatedVERY interesting vid Ken. People really need to look at all of Gil's vids. They are outstanding!http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=GJJ ... =videosGil does a great job for sure. Would be great if he would come and post here some.

[Bob]

kenmurray wrote:Bob wrote:kenmurray wrote:Here is an interesting video done by Gil Jesus:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QLFOzws ... elatedVERY interesting vid Ken. People really need to look at all of Gil's vids. They are outstanding!http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=GJJ ... =videosGil does a great job for sure. Would be great if he would come and post here some. I contacted just about every REAL JFK assassination researcher over the years, I'll see if I can get a hold of Gil and try and get him to join us from time to time.

[ThomZajac]

Excellent video, Ken. EXCELLENT. I am always leery of using the (altered) Zapruder film in an attempt to prove anything, but I do think the witness testimony proves the point entirely. Destroying the windshield?! This case is so obvious it wouldn't make a good episode of C.S.I.I would, however,like to use this topic to again point out something that I've been harping on for a while, Namely, that the medical staff (and others) at Parkland were certain that the president had been hit from the front (at least twice), but there is absolutely no such evidence from Parkland indicating that the president was hit from the rear. That only happens later; autopsy, autopsy photos, Zapruder film- things the planners could control. (And the 'testimony' of James Files).For many many years I had simply accepted that the president had been struck from behind, as this had never seemed to be in doubt for nearly every researcher (except David Lifton). The bullet wound in the back of the president seemed to make this a slam dunk. But knowing what we do about the altering of the president's body between Parkland and Bethesda, it now seems likely that the president's back wound was one of those body alterations; no one at Parkland saw it.Bottom line; JFK was not struck a single time from behind, in my opinion.