Inside The AARB Vol. 1, By Doug Horne

[kenmurray]

Review by Jim DiEugenio:http://www.ctka.net/reviews/horne_jd.html

[Phil Dragoo]

KenJim finds less new in Lifton than in the 1968 Clark Panel revelation of the 6.5 mm "fragment" on the AP x-ray which the autopsists missed, and the 1969 Garrison Oser-Finck revelation that the autopsy was controlled by military officers.He says Lifton's allegation of body hijacking and alteration was substantially deflated by Gary Aguilar's collection and collation of the newly declassified witness affidavits, i.e., Bethesda agreed with Parkland in re the occipital avuncular cerebellar wound of exit, the lying Robert Blakey to the contrary notwithstanding.Jim recommends Aguilar's essay in Murder in Dealey Plaza pp. 188-199.His overall estimation of Lifton is that the latter "lost critical distance from his subject."I gather the ARRB is like HSCA is like WarrComm: populated for the most part with brain-dead zombies of the Magic Bullet kind. The Board's Executive Director Robert Marwell and the execrable Gerald Posner should get a room.Jim notes the Board missed George Johannides documents, HSCA Lopez Report on Mexico City including annex "Was Oswald an Agent of the CIA", interviewing Ruth and Michael Paine.Jim says Gunn spanked Horne over "have you stopped beating your wife" questions for Humes, and in other ways says Humes had Lifton buffaloed, so passionately unbalanced was the latter. What I have seen in IV leads me to believe there were two caskets arriving and that Humes did whip out his saw 6:45 pm to 7:15 pm, taking care of any pesky bits. I don't hold Humes harmless by any stretch of the imagination. Goldfinger's laser saw, okay, but anything less, no whimpering.I was shocked to learn that Specter deliberately concealed the truth.Jim cites Gunn for being able to extract from Humes that the chief autopsist (puppet) burned not just the notes "stained with the blood of the late president" (!) but the man's FIRST DRAFT as well. Stained only with the truth. Also that Humes didn't recall if anybody had told him not to dissect the throat wound--well, duh, that's pretty lame, doctor, considering you're the only one in the room who didn't recall.Now, Gunn versus Stringer--Jim finds a huge significance in the exchange:STRINGER: You don't object to things.GUNN: Some people do.STRINGER: Yeah, they do. But they don't last long.I imagine Stringer had in mind Pitzer, found dead in his office October 29, 1966 of a .45 cal. wound. Or LIFE photographer Henry Suydam who committed suicide the following month, four of the magazine's high quality 4 x 5 inch color transparencies of Zapruder film frames critical to the timing problem debate having gone missing in his custody. That last I found a couple nights ago on Horne page 1205. Just chock full of little gems like that.And then Gunn and Horne found photographer Stringer not knowing White House photographer Robert Knudsen who was called into Bethesda the afternoon of the assassination and not seen by his family for three or four days. In 1988 Knudsen was shown the photos he ostensibly took; he said four were missing and one remaining had been badly altered, hair drawin in where there was a wound on the back of the head.Jim would have Patrick Fitzgerald cross-examining Knudsen. But Knudsen has crossed over and Fitzgerald is weak on seances.I favor the dangling-from-a-helicopter deposition of one of the few remaining principals of the government; be that as it may, I find Horne of use for bringing many significant matters to our attention, as does Jim DiEugenio in his conclusion of Part I.

[kenmurray]

Phil, Specter has a "Passion For Truth" when he wrote that book years ago.

[Dealey Joe]

I think it was misspelled. actually is "Pisson the Truth"

[Phil Dragoo]

Joe and Ken, I think you've nailed it.Arlen Specter has been peeing on our leg and telling us it's raining.Here's another great review of Horne, this one by David Mantik:http://www.assassinationscience.com/Hor ... .pdfMantik is the one who showed the 6.5 mm fragment on the AP skull x-ray was a darkroom forgery. Optical densitometry. And Mantik discusses a mercury bullet leaving that high trail on the lateral skull x-ray--someone could email him, that's Jimmy Files' signature.

[kenmurray]

Phil, here is Dr. Mantik talking with Fetzer about the JFK skull X-rays:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tnG6cdK ... re=related

[Phil Dragoo]

KenIn the first video Mantik tells Fetzer that Ebersole was in the best position to add the 6.5 mm artifact to the AP skull x-ray.In the second Mantik says the three consultants hired by the ARRB corroborated his published work in many regards.When Mantik points to the alleged authentic x-rays showing no brain where the alleged authentic photos show brain, are we to believe our lying eyes, or the WarrComm coven of witches, Posner, Bugliosi, and Dunkel.I've only personally discussed Mantik's work with one radiologist and one surgeon, and they each found it credible. The ARRB consultants wouldn't even buy the red or white spots as the posterior entry--and curiously, the ARRB didn't initially publish these consultants' reports. Imagine that.Imagine a government commission actually suppressing the truth.

[kenmurray]

Here is Doug Horne discussing Inside The AARB Vol 5 on the Real Deal with Jim Fetzer on March 31st:http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2010/03/doug-horne.html

[ThomZajac]

Excellent link!

[Phil Dragoo]

KenHorne in V seems much like Douglass.And the assertion of wound alteration, planting of bullets, alteration of Zapruder all proving conspiracy by the national security power to punish an unrepentant heretic--it's only taken a half century.Fetzer dropped his bomb that Krulak confirmed Lansdale in Dealey with the tramps.Here's a letter said to be genuine:http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/USO ... #39223Some have dismissed Horne as an extension of Lifton, but I take an organic view of each--a view which includes all who further a fuller understanding.