Malcolm Wallace

JFK Assassination
Kirk
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Malcolm Wallace

Post by Kirk »

understood it was just a first opinion.. [/quote]
Kirk
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Malcolm Wallace

Post by Kirk »

Dealey Joe,I pretty much agree with you on the Dal Tex Building as at least being the position of the actual fatal shots from the back. I do believe that shots were fired or even blanks from the TSBD building though. I think it was a requirement at the very least to make it look real. I agree also that Oswald was not only a patsy, but a patsy that had to go quietly and quickly. I am not sure about the called off aspect of the CIA, and that the Mafia just went on. The whole scenario where Tosh Plumlee flys people in to abort a mission seems very suspect to me, even if Plumlee comes across as credible, which he does for the most part. First, who in the CIA called it off? Second, they had phones? Third, why cut it so close being that it was so important? Phillips apparently could call it off at any time, so just tell Phillips would be the prudent thing. Seems like word would have gotten out as well down the line, and all the odd characters would not be there to just watch JFK go by in a parade. I think the called story is pure fiction. Maybe to ease guilt, or protect.
Kim Huisman
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Malcolm Wallace

Post by Kim Huisman »

Dealey Joe wrote:Kim Huisman wrote:Dealey Joe wrote:Kim welcome.firstly I don't think there were anyshots from the TSBD.It does seem the evidence points to Wallace being there.maybe to plant evidence but i think more as LBJ's eyepiecei think LBJ is in this over his head..but where do u think the shots came from joe? (besides the grassy knoll)Johnson was a leach and a con manhe was used by the power behind the throne.He was well aware that the hit was possibly coming down.The shooter from behind was in the Dal Tex building.I believe one thing for sure is it didn't come down as planned.The CIA called the hit off. The Maffia decided to go ahead and do it, so there may have been more and different shooters originally intended.From there on it was just a commedy of errorsOswald was never supposed to get out of the TSBD alive under the original plans.I think it is the reason it is so hard to decipher what happened with Oswald and Tippit.Another thing Oak Cliff was full of Anti-Castro Cubans and LHO was in the middle of that.On & Onok ok i know this story, its what james files tells right..
Dealey Joe
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Malcolm Wallace

Post by Dealey Joe »

Is there something wrong with James Files story?Please tell me a better one.
Kim Huisman
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Malcolm Wallace

Post by Kim Huisman »

Dealey Joe wrote:Is there something wrong with James Files story?Please tell me a better one.no, im sorry, i'm not always with tact sorry well, i think it's an option..but the thing is, i saw and read so much about the assassination, we got a saying here in holland; dan zie je door de bomen het bos niet meer, just too much info, too much theories..i think the james files theory (in my opinion a theory) is a plausible one.. a while ago, i read the crazies theory ever..
kenmurray
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Malcolm Wallace

Post by kenmurray »

Kim, THIS is the craziest theory ever as far has the JFK murder goes:http://www.history-matters.com/essays/f ... hantom.htm
Dealey Joe
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Malcolm Wallace

Post by Dealey Joe »

KimTheories are things that we know works but we can't prove it.There to me are different areas of knowledge.Things we accept as being trueThings that are most likely to be trueThings the might be trueThings that are not likely truethings we accept as not being trueI believe James Files has at the very least proven himself to be more than Most likely true.there are no holes in his story, he has been attacked and examined by the best.So I place him in the accepted as true category.until some of us truth seekers decide to accept some things as being true we will make no headway.we have no foundation to build on.i also totally believe Roger Craigmost all other witnesses are in the Not likely or less.that gives us a great base to build on.There are so many things we will never know and a lot of things we discuss that don't matterbut it is interesting to see if we can figure them out a bit.
Bob
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Malcolm Wallace

Post by Bob »

Good discussion folks. For more threads on Malcolm Wallace, go to the search box and type in Mac Wallace. Lots of information and posts.
Kim Huisman
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Malcolm Wallace

Post by Kim Huisman »

kenmurray wrote:Kim, THIS is the craziest theory ever as far has the JFK murder goes:http://www.history-matters.com/essays/f ... htmBesides the magic bullet theory i mean The theory i mean, is that J.D. Tippit was 'badgeman'.
kenmurray
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm

Re: Malcolm Wallace

Post by kenmurray »

Kim Huisman wrote:kenmurray wrote:Kim, THIS is the craziest theory ever as far has the JFK murder goes:http://www.history-matters.com/essays/f ... htmBesides the magic bullet theory i mean The theory i mean, is that J.D. Tippit was 'badgeman'.Kim, I agree with that. Tippit was doing other strange things before he was killed.Car #10, Where Are You?:http://jfkassassination.net/car10.htm
Post Reply