Realize the significance of this?
Realize the significance of this?
The significance cannot be overstated:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ8NJwq58Fg
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Realize the significance of this?
This completly destroys the sbt. What are they gonna say now? "The bullet then exited the Governor's thigh, opened a temporal rift, & flew back through time to deposit itself on the (wrong) stretcher. Some magic bullet, that 399! One thing: the doc said left thigh. Which thigh was he hit in? I always thought it was the right.
Re: Realize the significance of this?
McAdams and "Mr.Chicken" Von Pein will say the doc is "mistaken". These 2 clowns always talks about "factoids". A factoid to them is a KNOWN FACT they don't believe in.
-
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: Realize the significance of this?
That is confusing, that 399 must have really went wild..It had to be a magic bullet.This opens a new door, where dig they dig this one up?
Re: Realize the significance of this?
dankbaar wrote:The significance cannot be overstated:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ8NJwq58FgI do realize the significance and saw this video some time ago. The question in my mind instantly was, 'where is the bullet that was to be removed from Connolly at a later date'? Top down, bottom up, middle conformist government coup d'etat cover up all the way. Why should this not surprise us?
Trajectory Of A Lie
One example of manufactured evidence is the lie about Connally’s back wound. Why do supporters of the SBT say the wound was 3 centimeters long, when, in fact, it was only half as long? Why was the 1.5 centimeter wound a problem? Defenders of the theory say that if the Carcano bullet had struck sideways (as opposed to nose-on), it would have created a wound the same size as its length (3 centimeters), and such a long wound would be proof the bullet had been tumbling. If it had been tumbling, this, presumably, would be proof it had struck something else on its way to Connally’s back. The something else in this case: John F. Kennedy.Problem: Connally’s back wound was only as long as the wound in the back of Kennedy’s head: 1.5 centimeters. No one has suggested Kennedy was hit in the head with a tumbling bullet.
Re: Realize the significance of this?
Then Gerald Ford adds to the lie...http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/sibert.htmFord also added to the evil doings of his controllers, when he added Dick Cheney as his Chief of Staff while he was President, and also named Donald Rumsfeld as his Secretary of Defense. Oh yeah, Ford also name Poppy Bush as head of the CIA. Think those decisions had anything to do with what happened in the future?
Re: Realize the significance of this?
Robert Harris,I like your videos. In fact I use one myself: http://jfkmurdersolved.com/myths.htmI also like your analysis of the stretcher bullet and how another bullet was retrieved by nurse Bell.Here's to add some more to the confusion:JFK assassination AMAZING medical evidence newsDid you know this clip? I did not, just discovered it. Could you emaill me at dank@xs4all.nl ?I would like to exchange some further thoughts on your belief that one bullet could have gone through both Kennedy and Connally. I think I can quickly convince you that you could abandon that possibility. It's interesting, because the lone shooter theory rests on this thesis. You cannot have one shooter, without the single bullet theory. So if this is disproven, a conspiracy (= more than one shooter) is proven. Did you know that the single bullet theory was born 6 months after the fact, when James Tague could no longer be ignored? These rare postcards are from before the single bullet theory. 3 shots , 3 hits. no miss.The funny thing is they hang in the 6th floor museum. Not on the main exhibition on the 6th floor, but in the entrance hall on the ground floor. So when they had to acknowledge one miss, they did not want to consider more shooters, no, they clung to Oswald and instructed Arlen Specter to create a "solution". And he did! Wim