Another Suspicious Political Death in Texas?

Tom Bigg · Post by **Tom Bigg** » Mon Feb 15, 2016 1:09 am

Not sure what others think here, but it seems Texas law sometimes lacks the type of rigor we see elsewhere in the US?https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -his-head/

Slav · Post by **Slav** » Mon Feb 15, 2016 2:13 am

Pillow found over his head, another Marilyn Monroe.What's the reasons for his death?

Tom Bigg · Post by **Tom Bigg** » Mon Feb 15, 2016 2:37 am

Scalia was overweight by 50# or so, had chronic conditions, cigar smoker; but still no autopsy? Too late now to do forensics after embalming. If Texas fails in law enforcement, who will investigate Texas?

Bruce Patrick Brychek · Mon Feb 15, 2016 3:56 am

02.15.2016Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:02.15.2016 - Tom Bigg Originally Posted this Current, Interesting, Relevant Headline. Slav and Tom Biggfollowed with additional facts, points of information, questions, and theories that piqued my interest todevelop this further.Slav - I want to focus on your question, "What's the reason for his death ?" You clearly raised a Very ImportantQuestion in My Mind's Eye, in support of Tom Bigg's Original Query.I often use Analogies, Comparisons, References, and Similar Subject Matter's to High Light My Opinions.PLEASE THINK ALONG WITH ME.The Movie, THE PELICAN BRIEF, is based upon The Novel by John Grisham, is the Final Movie Work,Directed by Alan J. Pakula, Starring Julia Roberts and Denzel Washington.A POWERFUL, THOUGHT PROVOKING FAVORITE MOVIE OF MINE. Please watch it, or re-watch it,then Re-Think THE DEATH OF ANTONIN SCALIA, CONSERVATIVE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, ANDSTRONG SUPPORTER OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.Remember, Truth Can Be Stranger Than Fiction. My Opinion.THE PLOT AND STORY LINE OF THE PELICAN BRIEF:Darby Shaw, a Law School Student played by Julia Roberts, writes a Brief about THE MURDERS OF TWO (2) SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, which turns out to be true, followed by additional cover-up murders.BIG MONEY, CORRUPTION, CRIME, POLITICS, AND POWER ARE AT THE HEART OF THE CRIMES.The Reason is THAT THE TOTALLY UNSUSPECTED MURDER OF TWO (2) SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ALLOWS THEIR REPLACEMENT FOR CONTROL OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT FOR DECADES.BUSINESS, CORRUPTION, ECONOMIC, AND POLITICAL PERVERSIONS THAT WOULD ALLOW THE IMMEDIATE ANDLONG TERM BUSINESS, CORRUPTION, ECONOMIC, AND POLITICAL PERVERSIONS THAT COULD AND WOULD CONTROL AND EFFECT THE LONG TERM PERVERSIONS OF AMERICA THROUGH SOCIAL JUSTICE PERVERSIONS FROM THE SUPREME COURT, DOWN, WOULD BE SECRETLY AND SLOWLY IMPLEMENTED BY THE APPOINTMENTOF A CORRUPT PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself abouta Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Thoughts.Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings on anyaspect of this Subject Matter ?Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers who maynot be as well versed as you.Comments ?Respectfully,BB.

Tom Bigg · Post by **Tom Bigg** » Mon Feb 15, 2016 12:50 pm

Excellent points as usual Bruce. The blogs are full of concern on Scalia and what the political consequences will be. It isn't that hard to kill someone if you have no conscience, are paid enough, and have been trained in how to do it. Back in the 70s the CIAs Colby spoke about some of their methods when called before Congress. Ricin and like drugs leave little trace and in 99% of the cases unless you have someone with a dogged perseverance in uncovering the murder, probably it never comes to light. I knew a guy up in Torrington, CT Kevin Kuhne who I paid to align some giant binoculars with German WWII optics. Next thing I hear he had died. I spoke to a head of an optics company who suspected his lesbian wife poisoned him and subsequently got everything; Kevin had been in and out of the hospital always got better when he was away from her "service". Back problems; which are an indication of arsenic poisoning, etc.. Quickly cremated.It is hard to know--what do you suppose the chances would have been of uncovering foul play if there had been an autopsy? Are all toxicologists competent enough to nail down the cause? Rural Texas hours away from any populated areas? Had never been to this ranch before. Even the liberal bloggers are wondering who the other people were, the Koch's? A top power figure in the US with a genius IQ doesn't act in so careless a way; plus his son was supposed to be with him but decided not to go. Many questions here, and the "Pelican Brief" is a great movie; the terrible fear connected to wealthy corporations.

Bob Jonas · Post by **Bob Jonas** » Mon Feb 15, 2016 12:51 pm

I was afraid that I was being too cynical when my first reaction to his death was that it wouldn't surprise me if this was not a natural death due to the timing, his conservative beliefs, and who is in the White House. Glad I'm not the only one who is questioning this...but it is quite unnerving.

Bob · Post by **Bob** » Mon Feb 15, 2016 3:02 pm

Very interesting discussion here. While I'll agree that the scenario which surrounds the death of Antonin Scalia is pretty suspicious, as in how he was declared dead and then not having an autopsy, I would believe that he was held in high esteem with the power elite. By power elite, I mean the people who really run the United States and the world. I have not been a fan of Scalia's judgements on the Supreme Court, especially regarding two cases. The first being Bush v. Gore, when Scalia ruled in favor of Bush and did not recuse himself, even though he had two sons working for the Bush legal team.The second ruling was the disastrous ruling by Scalia and four other justices in the Citizens United case, which allows corporations and billionaires to basically buy politicians in an unfettered way using unlimited money to fund them.I would believe that the power elite would agree with the court decisions in both of those cases. So, why would they want Scalia eliminated?Just food for thought.

Bob Jonas · Post by **Bob Jonas** » Mon Feb 15, 2016 7:08 pm

It looks as if it's an attempt at procuring a drastic cultural change in the land by Obama, not the power elite. I doubt if the establishment cares if 3 men marry each other or if a minor wants to marry their pet, but I see a future where anything goes and if you object to it based on religious principles you will be branded a hate criminal. Well, except if you're Muslim and adhere to sharia law. They get a free pass even though their religious law calls for homosexuals to be put to death and for women having no rights. Welcome to bizarro-land.

Bob · Post by **Bob** » Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:31 pm

To me, Barry is part of the power elite. As I've often said, the last four Presidents, including Barry O, have ALL had ties and associations with the CIA before they moved into the White House. Now I know Barry is not perceived very well by the right regarding a number of issues, but what has he done to upset the power elite? Nothing. In fact, his policies have definitely helped Big War, Big Banking and Big Oil, just like his three predecessors did. Those are the "Holy Three" with the power elite. All the other stuff is just fodder for the talking heads, who try to ignite the masses (usually with disinformation).

Tom Bigg · Post by **Tom Bigg** » Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:49 pm

Bob wrote:Very interesting discussion here. While I'll agree that the scenario which surrounds the death of Antonin Scalia is pretty suspicious, as in how he was declared dead and then not having an autopsy, I would believe that he was held in high esteem with the power elite. By power elite, I mean the people who really run the United States and the world. I have not been a fan of Scalia's judgements on the Supreme Court, especially regarding two cases. The first being Bush v. Gore, when Scalia ruled in favor of Bush and did not recuse himself, even though he had two sons working for the Bush legal team.The second ruling was the disastrous ruling by Scalia and four other justices in the Citizens United case, which allows corporations and billionaires to basically buy politicians in an unfettered way using unlimited money to fund them.I would believe that the power elite would agree with the court decisions in both of those cases. So, why would they want Scalia eliminated?Just food for thought.I agree that Scalia's decisions were tinged with bias favoring his Republican friends; on Bush vs. Gore, various analyses were made: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._GoreAnd on Citizens United, I seriously doubt the founders would have backed that.Brilliant but flawed, but probably better and smarter than most of the Scotus judges.....

JFK RFK MLK Assassination Forum