words from Fletcher Prouty

[Jsnow915]

I was reading one of his notes to Jim Garrison and came across this....."what the researchers reveal just helps make the cover-up tighter, or they eliminate that evidence and the researcher"in the context of having a trial....its true if you think of it....no new evidence is kept secret...we throw it out there and the secret is lost and another cover up begins to cover the new evidence...so unless there is a trial on the JFK murder,any new evidence can be thrown to the public and it wont matter....sorry to say....any thoughts?

[kenmurray]

Jsnow, any new evidence that does come out rest assure the MSM won't report it unless it supports the lone nut theory.

[dankbaar]

I agree and see what he means.New evidence coming out, like JFK was shot in the throat, the Zapruder film is altered, a shot came from the storm drain, make the cover-up tighter. Throw a lot of garbage in a barrel of crystal clear water, and you don't see the bottom.

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

Dear Mr. Wim Dankbaar, Jack Snow, Ken Murray, and Fellow JFK Forum Members:Wim - My Friend, I had a lengthy meeting today with Jimmy. We discussed your comment, and those of a similar nature. Jimmy asked me to remind you that they will never change the history books as History is written by the Victorious. This is exactly why he drew a line in the sand after his 2003 Interview. Some people don't want the truth, some people can't handle the truth, some people don't understand the truth, some people won't believe the truth, and some people cover up the truth.Wim - You have gone farther, and accomplished more that anyone realizes, and surely further than many had hoped.This does not mean give up.Remember, retreating is often advancing in another direction.Jimmy said to say Hello, and we both send our Sincerest, Best Regards and Well Wishes to you and your family, especially your sister.All The Best.John Snow and Ken Murray, it may interest you to know that I discussed some of your opinions with Jimmy today, also. We both agree with you on several of your recent comments. While I eventually read everything on the JFK Forum, you two gentlemen are certainly always focused, and worth reading and studying. Ken, for you the word "studying" is expanded by me to also mean "viewing," but it is still valuable communication of knowledge nonetheless. Thank You, both.Comments ?Respectfully,Bruce Patrick Brychek.

[Jsnow915]

Bruce...thanks for the kind words....best regards to you and Jimmy....(ps...the J is for John...no offense taken and no apology needed)

[Bruce Patrick Brychek]

Dear Mr. John Snow, and Fellow JFK Forum members:John - Thank You for correcting me, and thanks for "knowing me" well enough to know that I meant no disrespect.A fellow member told me that the J stood for Jack as I recall. I should have just asked you.I corrected my previous error. You're a great JFK Forum member.We often agree, and I enjoy your Posts. I noticed that you and I really agreed on the JFK Exhumation Petition. When I told Jimmy about that today, and our mutual agreement he likened the Exhumation Petition to going after an elephant with a B-B gun.Comments ?Respectfully,Bruce Patrick Brychek.

[kenmurray]

Bruce, thanks too for the kind words.